| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Journal of the American College of Nutrition, Vol 10, Issue 3 209-219, Copyright © 1991 by American College of Nutrition
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
R. Benya and S. Mobarhan
Division of Gastroenterology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.
Tube feeding is commonly used for providing essential calories and nutrients to the patient otherwise unable to eat. In the last two decades there has been significant expansion in the number and quality of enteral formulas. In this review, we evaluate the indications for each major class of formula, and survey complications associated with formulas and devices that deliver formula. Recommendations for future research are listed.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. S. Barrett, S. J. Shepherd, and P. R. Gibson Strategies to Manage Gastrointestinal Symptoms Complicating Enteral Feeding JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, January 1, 2009; 33(1): 21 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. O. Lipman Grains or Veins: Is Enteral Nutrition Really Better Than Parenteral Nutrition? A Look at the Evidence JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, May 1, 1998; 22(3): 167 - 182. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Cremer and D. W. Gelfand Esophageal Bezoar Resulting From Enteral Feedings JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, September 1, 1996; 20(5): 371 - 373. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Park and P. O'Neill Management of neurological dysphagia Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 1994; 8(2): 166 - 174. [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
