JACN Did you know that you can get alerts when a new issue is online?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paijmans, I. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wilmore, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paijmans, I. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wilmore, J. H.

Journal of the American College of Nutrition, Vol 11, Issue 2 145-151, Copyright © 1992 by American College of Nutrition


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Use of skinfolds and bioelectrical impedance for body composition assessment after weight reduction

I. J. Paijmans, K. M. Wilmore and J. H. Wilmore
Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas, Austin 78712.

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of standard methods for estimating body composition in individuals who have undergone substantial and rapid weight loss. Subjects included 14 participants in a rapid weight reduction program using a very low-calorie diet, and 14 individuals of normal body composition matched with the obese group on the basis of gender, age, and height. Bioelectrical impedance (BI) and skinfold-derived estimates of relative body fat were compared with hydrostatic weighing in both groups. On the basis of mean values, standard errors of estimate (SEE) and simple correlations, none of the skinfold equations or the BI procedure were very accurate in the prediction of body fat in the group of weight-reduced obese patients. The Durnin-Rahaman (D-R) and Durnin-Womersley (D-W) equations were not significantly different from the hydrostatically determined values; however, correlations were low (r = 0.69 and 0.60). The Jackson-Pollock (J-P) equations and BI technique had high correlations (r = 0.78 and 0.89), but were significantly different from hydrostatic weighing. SEE for all equations and BI were high (greater than 4.5%). The control group was best predicted by the J-P equation (r = 0.88, SEE 3.5%, mean value of 21.2 +/- 4.3 vs 22.4 +/- 6.2%). BI and the D-R equation were also reasonably accurate. We conclude that additional research will be necessary to identify a predictive equation using skinfolds or BI that will provide more accurate estimates of relative body fat in individuals who have undergone substantial weight reduction in a relatively short period of time.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
N. Sarhill, F. A. Mahmoud, R. Christie, and A. Tahir
Assessment of nutritional status and fluid deficits in advanced cancer
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, November 1, 2003; 20(6): 465 - 473.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
L. A. Powell, D. C. Nieman, C. Melby, K. Cureton, D. Schmidt, E. T. Howley, J. O. Hill, J. R. Mault, H. Alexander, and D. J. Stewart
Assessment of Body Composition Change in a Community-Based Weight Management Program
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2001; 20(1): 26 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. C Utter, D. C Nieman, A. N Ward, and D. E Butterworth
Use of the leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance method in assessing body-composition change in obese women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 1999; 69(4): 603 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American College of Nutrition.