JACN Did you know that you can get alerts when a new issue is online?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vanderhoof, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Park, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vanderhoof, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Park, J. H.

Journal of the American College of Nutrition, Vol 11, Issue 2 223-227, Copyright © 1992 by American College of Nutrition


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effects of oral supplementation of glutamine on small intestinal mucosal mass following resection

J. A. Vanderhoof, D. J. Blackwood, H. Mohammadpour and J. H. Park
Department of Pediatrics, Creighton University School of Medicine.

Following massive small bowel resection, the remaining small bowel increases in mucosal weight, protein, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) content and absorptive function. Enteral nutrients are known to be important in stimulating this response. Recently, glutamine has been described as an essential fuel for the small intestinal mucosa and is thought to be trophic to the small bowel. We investigated if glutamine, when added to the diet in large quantities, might stimulate mucosal adaptation beyond that which normally occurs following physiologic feedings. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were placed on powdered rat chow supplemented with either 5% glutamine, 5% glycine or 5% glucose. After 4 days rats underwent 70% jejunoileal resection. Fourteen days after resection, protein, DNA and sucrase activity in the duodenum of the glutaminefed animals were all significantly lower than results from both the glycine and glucose groups. Duodenal mucosal weight was lower in the glutamine group than in the glycine group. In the ileum, DNA content was significantly lower for the glutamine group than the glycine group. These results suggest that high concentrations of glutamine in the diet can have negative effects on intestinal adaptation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
A R Weale, A G Edwards, M Bailey, and P A Lear
Intestinal adaptation after massive intestinal resection
Postgrad. Med. J., March 1, 2005; 81(953): 178 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C. Duggan, J. Gannon, and W A. Walker
Protective nutrients and functional foods for the gastrointestinal tract
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2002; 75(5): 789 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. L Buchman
Glutamine: commercially essential or conditionally essential? A critical appraisal of the human data
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2001; 74(1): 25 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
N Mandir and R A Goodlad
The effects of glutamine on intestinal epithelial cell proliferation in parenterally fed rats
Gut, May 1, 1999; 44(5): 608 - 614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American College of Nutrition.