JACN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, G.
Right arrow Articles by DiSilvestro, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, G.
Right arrow Articles by DiSilvestro, R. A.

Effects of Various Forms of Calcium on Body Weight and Bone Turnover Markers in Women Participating in a Weight Loss Program

Ginger Wagner, MS, RD, Shirley Kindrick, PhD, RD, Steven Hertzler, PhD, RD and Robert A. DiSilvestro, PhD

Human Nutrition, The Ohio State University (G.W., S.H., R.A.D.)
The Center for Wellness and Prevention, The Ohio State University Medical Center (S.K.), Columbus, Ohio


Figure 1
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Changes in body weight (BW) from pre- to post treatment with SE bars. *Statistically significant change from pre-values by paired t-test (p < 0.01).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Mean change in body weight (BW) post treatment with SE bars. No statistically significant difference was noted for change in BW for any treatment group versus the others (one-way ANOVA).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Pre- and Post-percent body fat (pBF) with SE bars. *Statistically significant change from pre-values by paired t-test (p < 0.01).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Average changes in percent body fat (pBF) with SE bars. *Significant difference between groups with Tukey-Kramer test (p < 0.05).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Pre- and post-treatment levels of BAP with SE bars. *Statistically significant increase in BAP from pre values with paired t-test (p < 0.001).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Pre and post (square route transformed) levels of helical peptide (HP). *Statistically significant change from pre value by paired t-test (p = 0.02).

 

Figure 7
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Mean changes (square route transformed) in HP with SE bars. *Statistically different mean change compared to the milk or placebo groups by ANCOVA and Fisher's LSD (p = 0.025).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Nutrition.