JACN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, L. E.

Assessing Hydration Status: The Elusive Gold Standard

Lawrence E. Armstrong, PhD, FACSM

Human Performance Laboratory, Departments of Kinesiology and Nutritional Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut


Figure 1
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Body fluid compartments that comprise 42 L of total body water in a 70 kg human, and sources of fluid gain or loss. Modified and redrawn from reference 24.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Changes of body mass, plasma and urinary indices of hydration status during a 41-hour dehydration and rehydration protocol involving highly trained cyclists. Abbreviations: B, baseline state before testing; D, dehydration to –4% body mass; E, after cycling exercise to exhaustion; 4H, after 4 h of ad libitum rehydration; 21H, after 21 h of ad libitum rehydration. Reprinted from reference 20.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. The relationship between loss of body water (% decrease of body weight) and the change of plasma osmolality. Redrawn from reference 27. This graph represents the combined data from two studies [28,29].

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Nutrition.