JACN Did you know that you can get alerts when a new issue is online?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adams, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Engstrom, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adams, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Engstrom, A.
Journal of the American College of Nutrition, Vol. 19, No. 90003, 339S-344S (2000)
Published by the American College of Nutrition

Helping Consumers Achieve Recommended Intakes of Whole Grain Foods

Judi F. Adams, MS RD and Alta Engstrom, RD, LD

Wheat Foods Council, Parker, Colorado

Address reprint requests to: Judi Adams, President, Wheat Foods Council, 10841 S. Crossroads Drive, Ste. 105, Parker, CO 80138


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 BACKGROUND
 WHY THE SHORTFALL?
 POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS FOR...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
According to research data from both the USDA and private companies, Americans consume approximately one serving of whole grain foods per day. Current guidelines recommend three or more servings a day. The health benefits of whole grains are well documented. However, convincing Americans to eat them, especially in the amount recommended, has been unsuccessful. Adults and children give a variety of reasons for not choosing whole grain foods, including these: a lack of understanding of the health benefits of whole grain foods, an inability to identify whole grain foods at the point of purchase, their taste, their cost, the time it takes to prepare them and the availability of whole grain foods in stores. This paper addresses some of the misconceptions surrounding whole grain foods and offers strategies for helping consumers choose more whole grain products. In addition, we present historical information on the consumption trends of whole grains as well as educational and promotional opportunities that industry and health professionals can use to encourage the public to eat more whole grains.

Key words: whole grains, Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSFII), folate, hard white wheat

Key teaching points:

• Health professionals must understand the benefits of these foods so that they can effectively communicate and influence consumers to incorporate more whole grains into their diets.

• Health professionals and food manufacturers must help consumers identify whole grain products and offer convenient, practical ways for adding them into the diet.

• The food industry and health professionals should use the recently approved FDA whole grain health claim as a tool for educating the public about the benefits of whole grain foods.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 BACKGROUND
 WHY THE SHORTFALL?
 POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS FOR...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
While recognition of nutrition as a science and how it affects health is relatively recent, dietary advice is not. For centuries cultures have been advising their members on what to eat and what to avoid. Certain foods used to be admonished against because of the diseases that they might cause, such as pork which carried trichinosis. During the Middle Ages, sailors were told to pack limes for their long voyages to prevent scurvy and, for generations, grandmothers have lobbied for diets rich in vegetables, fruits and whole grains because of their "roughage."

As much as advice has changed over the years, it also has stayed the same—as is evidenced in the writings of this anonymous author:

• 2000 BC—Here, eat this root.

• 1000 AD—That root is heathen. Here, say this prayer.

• 1850 AD—That prayer is superstition. Here, drink this potion.

• 1940 AD—That potion is snake oil. Here, swallow this pill.

• 1985 AD—That pill is ineffective. Here, take this antibiotic.

• 2000 AD—That antibiotic doesn’t work anymore. Here, eat this root.

Regardless of nutritional advances over the past century, it appears our ancestors had it right all along. Eating whole grains is a valuable part of a healthful diet. Current science is showing exactly how valuable.

Whole Grain Attributes
We consider the benefits of whole grains to be indisputable. In the 1970’s, fiber was recognized as a food component that could prevent constipation and cancer [1]. In more recent years, it’s been determined that whole grains are more than just fiber. Recent research has found that some of the vitamins and minerals, along with newly discovered phytochemicals and phytoestrogens in whole grains, have a beneficial effect on health. Whole grain intake is positively associated with enhancing insulin sensitivity [2], better weight control management [3], prevention of heart disease [4] and cancer [5]. Eating a diet rich in folic acid—found abundantly in regular and fortified whole grain products—helps prevent neural tube birth defects [6] and lowers homocysteine levels in the blood, which in turn may reduce the risk of heart disease [7]. Preliminary studies suggest folic acid may even have a role in protection against cancer.


    BACKGROUND
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 BACKGROUND
 WHY THE SHORTFALL?
 POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS FOR...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Dietary Recommendations for Whole Grains
No scientific studies have been done to determine the exact number of servings of whole grain foods that will benefit health. However, recommendations have been made by the American Dietetic Association [810], the Surgeon General and the USDA in its Food Guide Pyramid. Collectively, they suggest at least three servings of whole grain foods a day [11].

Several studies have reported that 20 to 30 grams of fiber a day, much of it coming from whole grain foods, has significantly lowered the risk of heart attacks and heart disease. The Nurses Health Study which has followed more than 75,000 women for 10 years found that those who ate two to three servings of whole grains a day had about half the risk of heart disease as women who ate almost no whole grain foods. Jacobs, et al. recently found that as little as one whole grain serving a day could decrease the risk of heart disease in women [4].

Actual Dietary Intake of Whole Grains
A study, conducted by Market Research Corporation of America (MRCA) from 1990 to 1992, discovered that most Americans failed to consume even one whole-grain food per day [12]. According to the USDA Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals, 1994–96 [13], white individuals over the age of two consume only 1.1 servings of whole grain foods per day. Blacks over the age of two consume even less, 0.7 servings, and Mexican Americans of the same age consume 0.8 servings. Interestingly, adult white males seem to be better at eating whole grains than females, 1.2 servings, as compared to 0.9 for adult white females 20 and over. Black adult males also consume more servings per day (0.7) when compared to black adult females (0.6). On the other hand, adult Mexican American females and males eat the same amount, 0.6 servings per day.

When it comes to age-related consumption numbers, there are differences between whites, blacks and Mexican Americans. White males and females over the age of 60 consume more whole grains daily than any other age group; males 1.3 servings, females 1.0 servings. Blacks, on the other hand, consume more as children than at any other age, 1.0 servings for males between the ages of two and five and 0.8 servings for females of the same age. The difference for Mexican American males is not as noticeable. Boys between the ages of two and 20 consume the same amount, 0.8 servings, while Mexican American female teenagers (ages 12 to 19) consume 1.2 servings of whole grains a day.

The total dietary intake of adolescents is a concern among most health professionals. According to a study by Levine and Guthrie [14], that concern is warranted. This age group does not consume an adequate number of servings of grains, vegetables, fruits and dairy foods. Wilson et al. showed that while many adolescents actually met the required grain servings, the average number of whole grain servings was far from the goal—1.0 servings a day for males and 0.9 for females.

Income levels also seem to affect the number of whole grain servings Americans choose [13]. Those individuals under 131 percent of poverty consume only 0.7 servings daily, while those at 131 to 350 percent of poverty consume 1.0 servings daily, and those over 350 percent of poverty eat 1.1 servings per day.


    WHY THE SHORTFALL?
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 BACKGROUND
 WHY THE SHORTFALL?
 POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS FOR...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Consumers’ Perception of Whole Grains
Why have the nutrition community and industry been unable to convince consumers to eat more whole grain foods? Perhaps it is the approach or, rather, lack thereof. Consumers do not know about the benefits of whole grain foods. According to Market Facts, 67 percent of consumers would eat whole grain products more often if they believed they could help reduce their risk of heart disease and cancer [16]. This survey found that interest in eating more whole grain foods significantly lags behind interest in eating more fruits and vegetables. The 1994–96 USDA Continuing Survey of Food Intakes By Individuals/Diet and Health Knowledge Survey reported that only 34 percent of women and 29 percent of men, 20 years and older, said it was very important to them personally to "choose a diet with plenty of breads, cereals, rice and pasta." Four percent said it was not important at all. Two-thirds of respondents replied it was "somewhat" to "not too" important to eat grain foods [13]. While this survey did not specifically ask about whole grains, the data suggest that grains, in general, are not top-of-mind.

Case histories and other studies show that a high percentage of Americans act upon nutrition beliefs if they are given a compelling reason to do so. In 1998, the International Food Information Council (IFIC) [17] conducted a telephone survey of 1,000 individuals over the age of 18. According to their findings, 95 percent of consumers agreed that "... certain foods may reduce the risk of certain diseases." Fifty-three percent act on that belief and eat specific foods for their particular health benefits.

When asked which foods may reduce the risk of disease, consumers mentioned the following: broccoli (21%), other fruit (20%), oranges/orange juice (13%), other vegetables (11%), carrots (10%), fish/fish oil (10%), garlic (10%), green, leafy vegetables (9%) and milk (8%). Fiber came in at seven percent—whole grains were never mentioned. Twenty-two percent of respondents linked fiber to colon cancer, but they made no link between colon cancer and whole grains. Only 10 percent associated fiber and whole grains with a lower risk for heart disease.

In 1999, IFIC held focus groups in Boston, Massachusetts, Columbus, Ohio, and Los Angeles, California [18]. When asked to name "hot" functional foods or nutrients, the following were mentioned: calcium, cranberry juice, fiber, fish oil/omega-3 fatty acids, folic acid, garlic, green vegetables, oat bran, soy, tomato sauce/lycopene. Whole grains did not make the top 10 list, but two of their components, oat bran and fiber, did.

Health professionals appear to lack an understanding of the value of whole grains and exactly what constitutes a whole grain food. A 1998 self-administered survey of dietitians [19] found that 61 percent thought the benefits of eating bran and fiber were the same as eating whole grains. A phone survey of military food service specialists a few years ago found that 90 percent of them believed they were serving whole-grain bread at their facility. In reality, only 22 percent were [20].

In 1998, a graduate student at the University of Nevada conducted research to determine attitudes among low-income adolescents towards consuming more whole grains, fruits, vegetables and dairy products [21]. Seven focus groups were done with 34 students, 50 percent of whom were female. The mean age of the children was 12.4 years.

Of the food groups discussed, participants were least familiar with whole grain foods. When asked about specific beneficial nutrients from whole grains, fiber was mentioned, as was the perception that these foods were "lower in calories" and might be beneficial for people who want to lose weight. Surprisingly, "good taste" was also cited as a reason to eat whole grains, as was the potential for better school performance (e.g., "I think they’re healthy because they help your brain work better.").

According to the focus groups, foods that compete with whole grains in the diet include white bread and other refined grain products such as cakes, cookies, pastries and pies. The participants offered strategies for increasing whole grain consumption, such as improving taste. Sweetening whole grain foods was favored, as was moistening them with milk or water. Serving whole grain foods instead of other snack foods or sweets was also suggested. Participants felt that telling people that whole grain foods are good for them or that they taste good might also encourage individuals to eat more. When asked what would make it easier to consume more whole grains, one participant replied, "if they can make oatmeal taste more like ice cream." Also, whole grains would be more readily eaten if these foods were easier to prepare, if the children knew how to prepare them or if they were prepared for them more often. The author was quick to point out that her findings may not be representative of all consumers because of the size and composition of this group.

In the fall of 1998, seven focus groups were sponsored by the Oklahoma Center for Advancement of Science and Technology [23] to investigate women’s attitudes toward folate-containing foods. Fifty-seven women, ages 18 to 44, participated. When asked, "Why do you eat grain foods," they offered six reasons: 1) grains are a traditional part of the meal; 2) they taste good; 3) they are filling, 4) convenient, 5) inexpensive and 6) readily available.

When asked what limits them from adding more grain foods to the diet, participants said they were trying to control their weight and they felt they already chose an adequate number of servings. Time and money were mentioned as obstacles to eating nutritiously.

The Food Marketing Institute and Prevention Magazine [24] team up annually to conduct a consumer survey titled "Shopping for Health." The 1999 survey found 21 percent of respondents had sought information in the past month on how to find whole grain products and 43 percent had sought ways to increase fiber intake. The more mature shopper (54 and over) was more likely than the younger shopper to want information on fiber (52% vs. 39%) and whole grains (28% vs. 18%). The primary source of information for both groups was grocery store personnel. Dietitians or nutritionists placed second and the Internet, third. Individuals most likely to seek information on fiber and whole grains were classified as "Progressive Self-Care" shoppers—people who place a great deal of importance on selecting healthy foods, along with herbal and natural remedies.


    POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS FOR OVERCOMING BARRIERS—INDUSTRY OPPORTUNITIES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 BACKGROUND
 WHY THE SHORTFALL?
 POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS FOR...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Educating Health Professionals and the Consumer
At every opportunity, industry must reach health professionals such as dietitians, nutritionists, nurse practitioners and physicians who interact with and influence consumers daily. Direct mail, advertisements in journals, exhibits at conventions, speaking forums and public relations materials are possible avenues for delivering the message. It is crucial for industry and food manufacturers to target these audiences and offer assistance in educating the public about whole grains.

Some professionals and consumers do not select whole grain foods because they have trouble in recognizing which foods offer whole grain ingredients.

Identifying Whole Grains
There are two ways that industry can help people find foods containing whole grains. One way is to use a flag or banner on products that predominately comprise whole grains. Another approach is to promote the benefits of whole grains through the recent, FDA-approved, health claim: "A diet rich in whole-grain foods and other plant foods and low in total fat, saturated fat and cholesterol may reduce the risk of heart disease and some cancers." These strategies remove the guesswork of whether or not a product is considered a whole grain food, and in the case of the health claim, its presence gives shoppers a strong incentive for choosing a whole grain product. Consumer research and past examples have proven that communicating the benefits of eating certain foods, including whole grain foods, increases consumption of them. For example, effective health professional and consumer campaigns promoting the claim "Soluble fiber from whole grain oat foods can help reduce cholesterol (when included in a diet low in saturated fat and cholesterol)" increased sales and consumption of whole grain oat products like oatmeal and Cheerios.

The new whole grain claim provides many opportunities for food manufacturers to promote a broad range of whole grain foods including cereals, breads, crackers and pasta.

Specifics on the Claim
The whole grain claim has been approved through a new process. It is based on the authoritative statements provision of the FDA Modernization Act of 1997. This process allows for a claim to be made if it is based on a published authoritative statement, which is currently in effect about the relationship between a nutrient and a disease or health related condition. The statement must come from a scientific body of the U.S. government with official responsibility for public health or human nutrition research. The whole grain claim is based on a statement from Diet and Health: Implications for Reducing Chronic Disease Risk (National Research Council, 1989). It was approved in July as a result of a claims notification submitted to the FDA by General Mills.

The notification defines "whole grain food" as a food containing 51 percent or more whole grain ingredients by weight per reference serving. It also stipulates that the food contain a minimum of 16 grams per serving and meet the other qualifications outlined in the claim. Compliance with the claim is determined by measuring the fiber level in the product. Because wheat is the predominate grain consumed in the U.S. diet, the level of fiber found in wheat is used as the reference level. These requirements allow a wide array of whole grain foods to qualify for the claim, including whole-grain breads and rolls, whole-grain hot or ready-to-eat cereals, crackers and whole-grain pasta.

Other Point-of-Purchase Strategies
The 1999 Shopping for Health survey [24] discovered that 90 percent of shoppers would "definitely" or "probably" use nutrition information posted right next to a product. Eighty-two percent would use pamphlets, and 70 percent would read a grocery store newsletter. This reiterates the many opportunities manufacturers have to connect with customers and influence their food selections. Packaging, shelf-talkers and recipe tear pads near foods can also communicate pertinent messages.

Improving Taste
Even if consumers understand the benefits of whole grains and are able to readily recognize them, they will not eat whole grain foods if they do not taste good. Whole-grain cereals appear to be well accepted; however, opinions vary on the palatability of whole-grain breads. Dryness and bitterness of whole grain products have been mentioned in various focus group discussions [21,23].

The industry is capable of making softer, moister whole grain products, and, in fact, many currently on the market meet that standard. Consumers need to be encouraged to try different foods until they find some which suit their tastes.

Recipes for whole-wheat French toast, meat loaf with whole grain crackers, whole wheat bread pudding and other creative ideas can be promoted to the consumer for tasty ways to increase whole grain consumption. In addition, adding whole grains such as wheat kernels, barley, oats, brown rice, amaranth and quinoa to casseroles, chili, soups and stews is an easy and convenient way to increase whole grain consumption.

Eating whole grain foods away from home may present a bigger challenge, as many restaurants offer little on the menu in terms of whole grains. When ordering breakfast, those eating out might choose a whole grain ready-to-eat or cooked breakfast cereal or ask for one if there is none listed on the menu. Whole-grain bagels and whole-wheat toast are excellent choices. At lunch, a sandwich on whole-wheat bread, a whole-grain bagel, pita or bun might be ordered. A whole-grain salad such as tabouli made from bulgur or a soup containing whole grain ingredients, such as barley or quinoa, might be available. At dinner, whole-grain breads in the breadbasket should be selected, the menu might be checked for whole grain side dishes or for mixed dishes containing a whole-grain component.

A relatively new variety of wheat, hard white wheat, is being grown, primarily in Kansas and Idaho. It may offer more whole-grain options. Hard white wheat has sufficient gluten quality and quantity to make bread products, in contrast to other white, milled wheat flour, which is usually used for cakes, pastries, cookies and Asian noodles. When ground into whole-wheat flour, hard white wheat can be a much milder tasting product than the usual hard red wheat grown in the U.S. Whole-wheat cakes have been successfully made from hard white wheat flour. They look and taste very similar to cakes made from the traditional refined soft white wheat flour. As the demand for this product grows, more bushels will be produced, and its availability will expand.

Cost Concerns
According to the Shopping for Health survey, 28 to 63 percent of shoppers feel "it costs more to eat healthful foods" [24]. Whole grain cereals and crackers do not appear to cost more than non-whole grain cereals and crackers. Whole grain breads and pasta, however, do. According to one major milling company, whole-wheat flour and white flour are sold at more or less the same price, but processing whole-wheat flour into bread is often a more expensive procedure because of the necessary addition of gluten for a texture and volume. Fortunately, consumers concerned about cost should still be able to eat three servings of whole grain foods a day relatively inexpensively. A large bowl of whole-grain, ready-to-eat or hot cereal, six to eight whole grain crackers, plus a slice of whole grain bread or a small whole grain bagel or a whole-wheat tortilla fill the quota.

Time Constraints
Time does not have to be an obstacle to eating whole grain foods. For example, it does not take more time to eat a bowl of whole-grain cereal than non-whole grain cereal or a slice of whole-grain bread instead of white bread. There are several whole-grain hot cereals on the market that take no longer than three minutes in the microwave. Certain whole grains such as whole-wheat kernels, need to be cooked about 15 to 20 minutes before they can be eaten. But since they are usually used in soups and stews, which have to be simmered for about the same amount of time, they can be added in at the start of meal preparation and be ready when the rest of the meal is done. Brown rice takes longer to cook than white rice, but it can be partially cooked ahead of time and refrigerated for last minute meals. Instant brown rice is also available in most grocery stores.

The food industry needs to be challenged to offer a wider variety of whole-wheat toaster waffles, good tasting low-fat whole grain muffins, whole grain children’s cereals, frozen whole grain pizza and other creative new products.

Product Availability
Other than consumers in small rural towns, just about anyone should be able to find whole grain products readily available in grocery stores. Changes in product labeling will make it easier to identify the scope of foods from which one can choose. As the demand increases, the American food manufacturer will find new ways to include whole grains in more products.


    CONCLUSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 BACKGROUND
 WHY THE SHORTFALL?
 POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS FOR...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Consumers are interested but confused about the role whole grains play in the diet. This is the industry and nutrition community’s window of opportunity to educate the public about whole grains. According to a USDA Economic Research Service bulletin [15] that reviewed nutrition education literature, four features must be present if it is to prompt a change in consumer behavior: motivation, clear and relevant messages, actionable changes consumers understand and continual reminders. These qualities need to be present in our efforts. Consumers have told us repeatedly, "Give us positive messages with the health benefits explained. Make the messages relative to me" [27]. Surveys show that most shoppers will use this kind of nutrition/health advice if it is available to them.

We can make the whole grain message as relevant to consumers as other successful nutrition campaigns have done, including those impressing the consumer with the importance of eating fruits and vegetables. It will take a creative, consistent and concerted effort on the part of industry and health professionals to educate the public on the benefits of eating whole grain foods. As more and more research demonstrates the influence of whole grains on health, it becomes clear that it is an effort worth making.

Received February 1, 2000.
    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 BACKGROUND
 WHY THE SHORTFALL?
 POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS FOR...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Burkitt, DP: Epidemiology of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 28: 3–13, 1971.[Medline]
  2. Fukagawa, NK, Anderson, JW, Hageman G: High-carbohydrate, high-fiber diets increase peripheral insulin sensitivity in healthy young and old adults. Am J Clin Nutr 52: 524–528, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Hamilton CC, Geil PB, Anderson JW: Management of obesity in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Educ 18: 407–410, 1992.
  4. Jacobs Jr DR, Meyer, KA, Kushi, LH, Folsom, AR: Whole-grain intake may reduce the risk of ischemic heart disease death in postmenopausal women: the Iowa Women’s Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr 68: 248–257, 1998.[Abstract]
  5. Jacobs DR, Marquart L, Slavin J, Kushi LH: Whole-grain intake and cancer: An expanded review and meta-analysis. Nutr Cancer 30: 85–96, 1998.[Medline]
  6. Cuskelly, GJ, McNulty H, Scott JM: Effect of increasing dietary folate on red-cell folate: implications for prevention of neural tube defects. Lancet 347: 657–659, 1996.[Medline]
  7. Malinow MR, Duell PB, Hess DL, Anderson PH, Druger WD, Phillipson BE, Gluckman RA, Block PC, Upson BM: Reduction of plasma homocysteine levels by breakfast cereal fortified with folic acid in patients with coronary heart disease. N Eng J Med 338: 1009–1015, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Schwartz, N: Narrowing the Gap: Practical strategies for increasing whole-grain consumption. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 34: 513–516, 1994.[Medline]
  9. ADA: Position of the American Dietetic Association: Health implications of dietary fiber. J Am Diet Assoc 97: 1157–1159, 1997.[Medline]
  10. ADA. Three are Key factsheet. J Am Diet Assoc, 1993.
  11. Welsh S, Shaw A, Davis C: Achieving dietary recommendations: whole-grain foods in the Food Guide Pyramid. C Rev Food Sci Nutr 34: 441–451, 1994.
  12. Albertson AM, Tobelmann, RC: Consumption of grain and whole grain foods by an American population during the years 1990 to 1992. J Am Diet Assoc 95: 703–704, 1995.[Medline]
  13. Wilson JW, Enns CW, Goldman JD, Tippett KS, Mickle, SJ, Cleveland LE, Chahil, PS. Data Tables: Combined results from USDA’s 1994 and 1995 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and 1994 and 1995 Diet and Health Knowledge Survey. ARS Food Surveys Research Group, 1997.
  14. Levine E, Guthrie JF: Nutrient intakes and eating patterns of teenagers. Fam Econ Nutr Rev 10: 3, 1997.
  15. USDA/ERS. Consumer Use of Information: Implications for Food Policy. AH-715, August 1999.
  16. Market Facts Inc. Consumer Dietary Habits. Chicago, IL, October, 1998.
  17. IFIC. Consumer interest in and awareness of functional foods survey. 1998.
  18. IFIC. Consumer focus groups on functional foods. Unpublished data. 1999.
  19. General Mills Inc: Self-administered survey of dietitians. October, 1998. Unpublished data.
  20. Warber JP, Haddad RD, Hodgkin GF, Lee JW: Foodservice spe-cialists exhibit lack of knowledge in identifying whole-grain products. J Am Diet Assoc 96: 796–798, 1996.[Medline]
  21. Snow GM: Using the principles of social marketing to explore adolescents’ perceptions and preferences related to food and nutrition education. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Nevada, Reno, 1999.
  22. Wheat Foods Council: Knowledge of food guidelines and the role of bread and grains in nutrition. The Gallup Organization, 1995.
  23. Russell MC, Parker S, Gates, GE: Enhancing prevention of neural tube defects in Oklahoma. Unpublished data, 1998.
  24. Prevention Magazine/Food Marketing Institute. "Shopping for Health." Emmanus, PA: Rodale Press, 1999.
  25. General Mills Inc: Whole Grain Foods Authoritative Statement Claim Notification. March 10, 1999.
  26. Elrick and Lavridge Inc.: "Nutritional Benefits Study" Cincinnati, OH: 1996.
  27. Dietary Guidelines Alliance: "Reaching Consumers with Meaningful Health Messages." Chicago, IL. 1996.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
P. Koh-Banerjee, M. Franz, L. Sampson, S. Liu, D. R Jacobs Jr, D. Spiegelman, W. Willett, and E. Rimm
Changes in whole-grain, bran, and cereal fiber consumption in relation to 8-y weight gain among men
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2004; 80(5): 1237 - 1245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
L. Marquart, D. R. Jacobs Jr, and J. L. Slavin
Whole Grains and Health: An Overview
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., June 1, 2000; 19(90003): 289S - 290.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adams, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Engstrom, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adams, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Engstrom, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS