JACN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casiraghi, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Brighenti, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Casiraghi, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Brighenti, F.
Journal of the American College of Nutrition, Vol. 25, No. 4, 313-320 (2006)
Published by the American College of Nutrition

Post-Prandial Responses to Cereal Products Enriched with Barley ß-Glucan

Maria Cristina Casiraghi, MD, Marcella Garsetti, PhD, Giulio Testolin, MD and Furio Brighenti, MD

Department of Food Science & Microbiology—Human Nutrition Unit—University of Milan (C.C., M.G., G.T.)
Department of Public Health—Human Nutrition Unit—University of Parma (F.B.), ITALY

Address reprint requests to: Cristina Casiraghi, Department of Food Science & Microbiology-Human Nutrition Unit-University of Milan, Via Celoria N.2, 20133 Milan, ITALY. E-mail: maria.casiraghi{at}unimi.it


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Background: High amounts of soluble ß-glucan in barley products may exert beneficial effects on glucose tolerance and blood lipids.

Objective: To investigate the acute postprandial response on plasma glucose, insulin and lipids after consumption of two experimental products made from barley flour enriched with ß-glucan in comparison with similar products made from whole-wheat flour.

Methods: A group of 10 healthy volunteers (5 males, age 25.4 ± 0.5 y, BMI 22.6 ± 0.7 Kg/m2) received at breakfast, in random order and in different days, portions (40g of available carbohydrate) of different cereal products or white bread consumed together with a load of 90000 UI retinol. Products were crackers and cookies made either from barley or whole-wheat flour in a 2 x 2 design, where the two factors were the cereal source of dietary fiber (DF), and the food processing. Barley products supplied 12 g DF, 50% soluble, with 3.5 g of ß-glucan per portion. Whole-wheat products supplied about 14 g of dietary fiber, mainly in the insoluble form, with negligible amount of ß-glucan. Fasting and post-prandial glucose and insulin were evaluated for 180 min after the meals; retinyl-palmitate (RP) and triacylglycerol (TAG) were evaluated hourly over 8 hours. Glycemic (GI) and Insulinemic (II) indexes of products were also assessed, using white bread as reference.

Results: Glucose curves were significantly different between types of food processing (p < 0.01) but not between cereal sources of DF (p = 0.07). On the contrary, the effect of fiber but not of processing was evident when glucose response was expressed as Glycemic Index (effect of DF p < 0.01, effect of processing p = 0.69). Individual GI values were 78, 81, 49 and 34 for whole-wheat crackers (WWCr), whole-wheat cookies (WWc), barley crackers (BCr) and barley cookies (Bc) respectively. Insulin curves were significantly different both between type of processing and fiber source (p < 0.001 for both effects). Again, insulin indices were different between fiber but not between processing (p < 0.5 and p = 0.174 respectively). RP and TAG daily profiles were not significantly different between the factors studied.

Conclusions: Products prepared from barley flour enriched with ß-glucan exhibit favourable responses on glucose metabolism, and particularly on insulinemic responses. In general, cookies responded better to the addition of barley fiber than crackers. Our results highlight the complexity of the effect that barley fiber may exert when added to different food products in reducing postprandial metabolic responses.

Key words: barley ß-glucan, functional foods, glycemic and insulinemic indices, post-prandial lipemia

Abbreviations: ANOVA = analysis of variance • Bc = barley cookies • BCr = barley crackers • BMI = Body Mass Index • CM = chylomicra • DF = dietary fiber • FP = food processing • GI = Glycemic Index • HSD = honest significant differences • II = Insulinemic Index • Mw = molar weight • OGTT = oral glucose tolerance test • RM-ANOVA = repeated measures analysis of variance • RP = retinyl-palmitate • SEM = standard error of the mean • TAG = triacylglycerol • VLDL = very low density lipoprotein • WBr = white bread reference • WWc = whole-wheat cookies • WWCr = whole-wheat crackers


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The development of food products that provide benefits beyond their traditional nutritional value has raised academic, industrial and public interest. In recent years, the ability of functional foods to impact metabolic parameters and eventually chronic diseases such as diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease and cancer has been deeply explored. Recent population studies have shown that the Glycemic Index (GI) is positively associated with the risk of developing type 2 diabetes [1–2] and coronary heart disease [3]. Low-GI foods might play a role, and therefore could be defined as functional foods, in reducing the risk of such chronic diseases.

However, most of the conventional cereal products eaten at breakfast or as a snack have medium/high GI, ranging from 60 to 120 (bread as reference) [4].

Viscous fibers have been shown to reduce post-prandial glycemia and insulinemia [5–7], and have also been recognized since the 1960s as having lipid-lowering effects. Because barley grain has a high concentration of soluble fiber, and especially of ß-glucan (linear chains of ß-glucosyl residues joined through (1 -> 3) and (1 -> 4) linkages), there is an emerging interest in barley as a functional food ingredient [8–10]. Indeed this has promoted interest in high- ß-glucan cultivars and in technological processing to concentrate these components in barley flour.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate glucose and insulin responses of two different products obtained from barley flour enriched in ß-glucan (8.5%) in comparison with similar products prepared with whole wheat flour and to calculate their Glycemic and Insulinemic Indices. We used a concentrated ß-glucan fraction from a commercially variety (Hordeum vulgare, Cv. Aliseo) of barley, obtained by air classification technique, to prepare the food products, cookies and crackers. Moreover, if long-term beneficial effects of dietary fiber on lipid metabolism seem established [11], the mechanism whereby dietary fiber affects lipid digestion and absorption is not completely understood. This is particularly important because it is now recognized that elevated post-prandial lipemia is an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease [12–13]. Therefore, we investigated the effects of barley ß-glucan on post-prandial lipemia, in order to verify if barley fiber specifically affects post-prandial lipids absorption.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Raw Material and Products
A commercial stock of a barley variety (Hordeum vulgare, Cv. Aliseo) was de-hulled, pin-milled and then fractionated into coarse and fine fractions by air classification [14]. In the coarse fraction (yields about 38%) ß-glucan were concentrated to 8.5%, from 4.7% of the original barley flour (dry weight). This fraction was used to prepare two experimental products, cookies (Bc) and crackers (BCr). Products were prepared by replacing 60% wheat flour with the coarse barley fraction and manufactured in a single batch on a pilot plant. Similar whole-wheat products, whole-wheat crackers (WWCr) and cookies (WWc) made by incorporating 60% wheat bran to wheat flour and manufactured on the same plant, were used as a control to compare the effects of the source of cereal fiber. A commercial White Bread (WB) was purchased in a local supermarket and used as reference food.

Chemical Analysis of Experimental Products
Products were analysed by ICC standard procedures [15] for moisture (method 110/1), crude protein (N x 6.25; method 105/2) and total fat (method 136). Soluble and insoluble dietary fiber was assessed by the enzymatic-gravimetric procedure [16]; ß-glucan content was determined using the approved enzymatic method 32.23 (Megazyme International, Ireland, Bray, Ireland) [17]. Carbohydrates were evaluated as simple sugars [18], total and resistant starch [19].

Composition of experimental products is reported in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Composition of Experimental Products

 
Subjects and Test Meals
Ten healthy subjects (five men), age 25.4 ± 0.5 (mean ± SEM) years, BMI 22.6 ± 0.7 Kg/m2, fasting plasma glucose 5.0 ± 0.1 mmol/L and fasting insulin 66.2 ± 3.9 pmol/L, volunteered for the study. Written informed consent was obtained from each subject. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Milan. A total of seven different test meals were given in random order at breakfast after an overnight fast on separate mornings {approx}2 week apart. Test meals were served with 500 mL of unsweetened tea and contained 40 g available carbohydrates, either from the four experimental products or from white bread, the standard food used for GI calculation that was administered three times [20]. The carbohydrate load was lower than the generally accepted 50 g used for GI calculation but this was due to the portion volume, that otherwise would have been too high to allow products to be eaten in about ten minutes. However it has been demonstrated that GI values can be reliably calculated from available carbohydrate loads ranging from 25 to 50 g and over [21].

Portion sizes were 95 g for crackers, 85 g for cookies and 90 g for white bread and provided 1553, 1659, 1592 and 1687 KJ respectively for WWCr, WWc, BCr and Bc. A water-soluble vitamin A preparation containing 90000 UI retinol (Arovit ®, Roche S.p.A., Milan) was administered just before the start of test meals, diluted in 50 ml of tea. The use of Vit A has been shown to be a convenient and pertinent method to label chylomicra (CM) for tracking fat absorption [22–23].

Meals were administered between 0800 and 0830 and were eaten within 10 min. Zero time was set at the time of the first morsel of food. Blood samples, obtained through an intravenous catheter inserted into a forearm vein, were taken shortly before and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 min and then at hourly intervals for the following 5 h after the test meals. A standard light lunch, the same for each of the test days, composed of white bread (50 g), roast-beef (70 g) and apple (200 g) (27.0 g protein, 2.3 g lipid, 59.2 g carbohydrate; 1481 KJ) was served 4 h after breakfast. Subjects were asked to abstain from cigarette smoking and were allowed free access to water.

Blood samples were drawn into vacutainer tubes (Venoject II, VP-054SAHL, Terumo Europe, Leuven, Belgium) containing Li-Heparine 75 USP, covered with aluminum foil in order to protect the samples from the light. Plasma was then recovered within 30 min by centrifugation (1000 g, for 15 min at room temperature), divided into portions and stored at –20°C for later analysis of glucose, insulin, triacylglycerol (TAG) and retinyl-palmitate (RP). Glucose was assayed using an automatic analyser (YSI Stat 2300, Yellow Springs, OH, USA) and insulin by Microparticle Enzyme Immunoassay [24] using a dedicated analyser (MEIA Insulin, IMX System, Abbott Laboratories). The Glycemic and Insulinemic Indices (II) were calculated from the 120 and 180 min incremental areas under the post-prandial glucose and insulin responses respectively, ignoring any area beneath the baseline [25]. White wheat bread was used as reference food: the mean IAUC of three trials was used to calculate both GI and II. Plasma concentrations of RP were estimated by reverse-phase HPLC after plasma total lipids extraction with Folch’s solution, as reported by Lemieux et al [26]. Triacylglycerols were measured by enzymatic colorimetric method, using a clinical analyser (ILab 600 Analyzer, Instrumentation Laboratory, Lexington, MA, USA).

Data Analysis
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Data were submitted to two ways Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (RM-ANOVA), with a 2 x 2 design, were the two factors were the source of dietary fiber, i.e. barley vs wheat, and the food processing (FP), i.e. crackers vs cookies. The effect of each factor, the interaction between each factor and time and the interaction between the two factors was examined. If significant effects of interactions (p < 0.05) were found, the significance of differences between products and/or time were checked by Tukey’s Honest Significant Differences post-hoc test. GI and II were analysed by one way RM-ANOVA. The analyses were performed using the StatSoft Statistica Package for Windows (release 4.5, Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Subject’s fasting blood glucose and insulin levels were in the normal range, and did not differ among test products or white bread.

In Fig. 1 are reported the blood glucose responses induced by wheat and barley products, according to the type of product (crackers and cookies). A statistically significant effect was found for FP (p < 0.01), and for the interaction DF x FP (p < 0.05), with cookies having lower glycemic responses than crackers and Bc being significantly lower than all other products (p < 0.01, Tukey post hoc test). Interaction time x DF was also statistically significant (p < 0.05) with Bc showing the lowest post-prandial glycemia, significantly different from that of WWc at 30 and 45 min after breakfast (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05 respectively). On the contrary, although BCr tended to give a lower glycemic profile than WWCr, their difference was not statistically significant.


Figure 1
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Plasma glucose post-prandial responses (mean ± SEM) in healthy subjects after ingestion of crackers (left) or cookies (right) meals (n = 10):whole wheat ({blacktriangleup} dashed line); barley ({blacksquare} solid line). Statistics (RM-ANOVA): DF effect: F(1,72) = 3,34; p < 0.05. FP effect: F(1,72) = 7.53; p < 0.01. DF x FP interaction: F(1,72) = 4.22; p < 0.05. Significant differences (Tukey HSD post-hoc test): * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 DF effect at time point.

 
Insulin responses (Fig. 2) were closely associated with glucose responses, with significant (p < 0.001) effect of both DF and FP on post-prandial insulin plasma concentration; the interaction time x DF was also statistically significant (p < 0.01). BCr elicited flattened insulin curves, significantly (p < 0.05) lower than WWCr at 45 min after breakfast. Similarly Bc showed a post-prandial insulin response significantly lower than WWc at 30 and 45 min (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05 respectively). A significant difference (p < 0.01) in insulin responses was observed also between crackers and cookies irrespective of the source of fiber added. In Table 2, glucose and insulin IAUC, GI and II are shown. DF significantly affected both GI (p < 0.01) and II (p < 0.05), with barley products having lower responses than the corresponding whole wheat products. On the contrary, the effect of food product was not significant (p = 0.6910 for GI and p = 0.1741 for II). Pairwise comparison showed significant differences (p < 0.05) in GI between WWc and Bc, and in II, between WWCr and BCr, WWc and Bc, WWCr and WWc.


Figure 2
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Plasma insulin post-prandial responses (mean ± SEM) in healthy subjects after ingestion of crackers (left) or cookies (right) meals (n = 10):whole wheat ({blacktriangleup} dashed line); barley ({blacksquare} solid line). Statistics (RM-ANOVA): DF effect: F(1,72) = 18,34; p < 0.001. FP effect: F(1,72) = 12.27; p < 0.01. Significant differences (Tukey HSD post-hoc test): * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 DF effect at time point; a,b (p < 0.05) FP effect at time point.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. Glucose and Insulin IAUCs, Glycemic and Insulinemic Indexes of Experimental Products1

 
The post-prandial profile of RP is reported in Fig. 3. Following the consumption of test meals, RP plasma concentrations increased, reaching a peak at 120 min and then decreasing towards values which were similar to baseline after 8 h. In crackers, barley elicited lower RP values than whole-wheat, with significant differences (p < 0.05) at 180 min; on the contrary in cookies, whole-wheat showed RP plasma concentrations lower than barley, without any significant difference among products.


Figure 3
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Plasma retinol-palmitate 8 h responses (mean ± SEM) in healthy subjects after ingestion of crackers (left) or cookies (right) meals (n = 10):whole wheat ({blacktriangleup} dashed line); barley ({blacksquare} solid line). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 DF effect at time point; a,b (p < 0.05) FP effect at time point.

 
As shown in Fig. 4, post-prandial triacylglycerol curves did not reveal any differences among test meals.


Figure 4
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. Plasma triacylglycerol responses (mean ± SEM) in healthy subjects after ingestion of crackers (left) or cookies (right) meals (n = 10):whole wheat ({blacktriangleup} dashed line); barley ({blacksquare} solid line).

 

   DISCUSSION
 
In the present study, the post-prandial glycemic, insulinemic and lipemic responses to crackers and cookies made from whole-wheat flour or barley flour enriched with ß-glucan were determined in healthy subjects.

Barley products elicited more favourable metabolic responses than whole-wheat products when looking at post-prandial glucose and insulin profiles, resulting in significantly (p < 0.05) lower Glycemic indices for cookies and in significant (p < 0.05) reduced Insulinemic indices for both crackers and cookies. The GI values observed for barley cookies (mean GI = 34; range 10–65) tend to be lower than the range reported elsewhere for cookies (57–106) [4]. The GI values calculated in this study are affected by a high variability, with a mean CV% of 63 (range 55–74). Such an high CV value, however, is comparable with other results from the literature [20] and could be partially related to the use of venous blood, often associated with greater within-subjects variation of both glycemic responses and GI values and non-normal distribution of GI values [20]. However, the elevated number of plasma variables simultaneously evaluated in our experimental protocol did not permit the use of capillary blood, which probably would have been resulted in a lower variability of our results. The role of viscous fiber in reducing the rate of absorption is well documented in literature [27]. Barley is high in soluble viscous fiber and the consumption of products such as pasta, bread and porridge enriched with barley ß-glucan has been repeatedly shown in literature to blunt glycemic and insulinemic responses [28–31].

The extent of reduction has been investigated by Jenkins [32], who demonstrated that each gram of ß-glucan can be expected to lower the GI by 4 GI units, and that this effect is not attenuated by the food process. The GI reduction induced by barley ß-glucan compared to whole-wheat observed in our study was even more marked, ranging from 8.5 (crackers) to 15.2 (cookies) units of GI reduction per gram of added ß-glucan.

Battilana et al. [33] suggested that the lowered post-prandial glucose concentrations which are observed after a single meal containing ß-glucan are essentially due to a delayed and somewhat reduced carbohydrate absorption from the gut, and do not result from the effects of fermentation in the colon.

That the effect is related to the impairment in transit and absorption due to meal viscosity is suggested by the studies of Wood et al [34], who has shown a highly significant linear inverse relationship between log[viscosity] of ß-glucan mixtures and the glucose and insulin responses in healthy subjects. The relationship showed that 79–96% of the changes in plasma glucose and insulin was attributable to viscosity. Recently, the same author [35] reported a significant relationship between the peak of blood glucose and a combination of the logarithm of the concentration and the logarithm of the molar weight (Mw) of purified oat ß-glucan given in a 50 g—OGTT at doses from 1.8 to 14.5 g/500 ml. Unfortunately, we did not measure the Mw of ß-glucan used in our products; a difference in Mw, and thus in the viscosity induced in the intestinal lumen, can be advocated to partially explain the different potential in blunting glycemic responses of barley ß-glucan used in our study compared to ß-glucan used by Jenkins.

In the present study, despite a similar composition in lipids, protein and amount of fiber, cookies showed lower glycemic and insulinemic IAUCs, in comparison with crackers, even if this trend reached statistical significance only for whole-wheat insulinemic response (p < 0.05).

Processing may have an effect on glucose and insulin responses. Water available for starch gelatinisation, temperature, baking time and pressure, are all factors that influence the rate of starch digestibility [36] and thus the glycemic impact of a product. A combination of 5–10% dough moisture in cookies, as opposite to 10–20% in crackers, and the presence of simple sugars that further reduce water activity, might have resulted in a lower degree of starch gelatinisation in cookies.

This effect could have been strengthened by the presence of barley ß-glucans, which can trap large amounts of water themselves, thus explaining the significant (p < 0.05) reduction in glucose IAUCs and in GI evaluated for barley cookies in comparison with whole-wheat cookies.

In the present study neither fiber source nor type of processing seemed to affect plasma TAG response to tested products. Similarly, Cara et al. (1992) [37] demonstrated that 10 g of dietary fiber added to a meal containing 70 g of fat had the same effect in reducing post-prandial TAG response, irrespectively of the type of fiber fed (oat bran, rice bran, wheat fiber or wheat germ).

Measurement of plasma triacylglycerols concentrations after meals is a simple way to assess post-prandial lipemia, but this approach does not differentiate triacylglycerol-rich lipoproteins of intestinal origin, i.e. chylomicra and their remnants, from endogenous triacylglycerol-rich lipoproteins (VLDL) derived from the liver. This distinction can be made by administrating vitamin A with the test meals. Vitamin A is incorporated into lipoproteins as retinyl-palmitate (RP) during fat absorption and is thought to remain associated with the same lipoprotein from its secretion by the intestine [38,39], until uptake by the liver without being resecreted as lipoprotein component [40]. Therefore RP constitutes, even though with some limitations [26,41], a useful marker of chylomicra secretion and clearance [22–23]. In this study RP post-prandial responses were similar among products suggesting that neither fiber source nor food structure had an effect in the modulation of fat absorption. It cannot be excluded that the effect of fiber in a meal containing higher amounts of fat could have been different, although the type of food product tested is likely to be preferentially consumed alone as a snack or within a light breakfast, without substantial amount of added fats. Effective low GI high-fiber products could play an important role in increasing fiber intakes and reducing the glycemic load of the diet. The availability of functional cereal products naturally enriched with dietary fiber and slightly processed in order to prevent starch gelatinisation, could help the public to increase dietary fiber intake and to maintain protective post-prandial metabolic patterns. However, our results highlight the complexity of the effect that barley fiber may exert when added to different food products in reducing postprandial metabolic responses.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
 
The study has been supported by a grant from the Ministry of University and Scientific and Technological research (MIUR) n. 2232-Law ’46. Dr. F. Ghirelli and Dr. R. Santi are gratefully acknowledged. We thank Dr. A. Bonfiglio and D. Contino for their technical assistance.

Received March 10, 2005. Accepted February 11, 2006.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Salmeron J, Manson J, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Wing AL, Willet WC: Dietary fiber, glycemic load and risk of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in women. JAMA277 :472 –477,1997 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Salmeron J, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, Spiegelman D, Jenkins DJ, Stampfer MJ, Wing AL, Willett WC: Dietary fiber, glycemic load and risk of NIDDM in men. Diabetes Care20 :545 –550,1997 .[Abstract]
  3. Liu S, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Hu FB, Franz M, Sampson L, Hennekens CH, Manson JE: A prospective study of dietary glycemic load, carbohydrate intake, and risk of coronary heart disease in US woman. Am J Clin Nutr71 :1455 –1461,2000 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Foster-Powell K, Holt SHA, Brand-Miller JC: International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002. Am J Clin Nutr76 :5 –56,2002 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Wursch P, Pi-Sunyer FX: The role of viscous soluble fiber in the metabolic control of diabetes: a review with special emphasis on cereals rich in beta-glucan Diabetes Care20 :1774 –1780,2002 .
  6. Wolever TMS: Dietary carbohydrates and insulin action in humans. Br J Nutr83 (Suppl 1) :S97 –S102,2000 .
  7. Jenkins DJA, Axelsen M, Kendall CWC, Augustin LSA, Vuksan V, Smith U: Dietary fibre, lente carbohydrates and the insulin-resistant disease. Br J Nutr83(Suppl 1) :S157 –S163,2000 .
  8. Newman RK, Newman CW: Barley as a food grain. Cereal Foods World36 :800 –805,1991 .
  9. Fastnaught CE: Barley fiber. In Cho S, Dreher ML (eds): "Handbook of Dietary Fiber." New York: M. Dekker, Inc, pp519 –542,2001 .
  10. McIntosh GH, Newman RK, Newman CW: Barley foods and their influence on cholesterol metabolism. In Sinopoulos AP (ed): Plants in Human Nutrition. Basel: World Rev Nutr Diet Karger, pp89 –108,1995
  11. Brown L, Rosner B, Willett WW, Sacks FM: Cholesterol-lowering effects of dietary fiber: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr69 :30 –42,1999 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Dallongeville J, Fruchart JC: Postprandial dyslipidemia: a risk factor for coronary heart disease. Ann Nutr Metab42 :1 –11,1998 .[Medline]
  13. Boquist S, Ruotolo G, Rong T, Bjorkegren J, Bond MG, de Faire U, Karpe F, Hamsten A: Alimentary lipemia, post-prandial triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, and common carotid intima-media thickness in healthy, middle-aged men. Circulation100 :723 –728,1999 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Marconi E, Panfili G, Ferrante MP, Raponi F, Falasca L, Fratianni A, Cubadda R: Functional pasta and bakery products from barley flour enriched in bioactive compound. "Proceedings of the Second International Workshop Durum Wheat And Pasta Quality: Recent Achievements and New Trends." Rome, 19–20 November2002 .
  15. ICC: Standard methods of the International Association of Cereal Science and Technology. Vienna: ICC,1995 .
  16. Prosky L, Asp NG, Schweizer TF, DeVries JW, Furda I, Lee SC: Determination of soluble dietary fiber in foods and food products: collaborative study. J AOAC Int77 :690 –694,1994 .[Medline]
  17. American Association of Cereal Chemists: "Approved Methods of the AACC," 10th ed. St Paul MN: AACC,2000 .
  18. Zygmunt LC, Anderson E, Behrens B, Bowers R, Bussey M, Cohen G, Colon M, Deis C, Given PS, Granade A, Harms C, Heroff JC, Hines D, Hung GW, Hurst WJ, Keller J, Laroche FB, Luth W, McKay D, Mertle T, Navarre M, Rivera R, Scopp R, Scott F, Sherman R, Sloman K, Sodano C, Trick KD, Vandine BR, Webb NG: High pressure liquid chromatographic determination of mono- and disaccharides in presweetened cereals: Collaborative study. J Ass Off Anal Chem65 :256 –264,1982 .
  19. Champ M: Determination of resistant starch in food and food products: interlaboratory study. Eur J Clin Nutr42 (Suppl 1) :S51 –S61,1992 .
  20. Wolever TMS, Vorster HH, Bjorck J, Brand-Miller J, Brighenti F, Mann JI, Ramdath DD, Granfeldt Y, Holt S, Perry TL, Venter C, Xiaomei Wu: Determination of the glycaemic index of foods: interlaboratory study. Eur J Clin Nutr57 :475 –482,2003 .[Medline]
  21. Wolever TMS, Bolognesi C: Source and amount of carbohydrate affect postprandial glucose and insulin in normal subjects. J Nutr126 :2798 –2806,1996 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Berr F, Kern Jr F: Plasma clearance of chylomicrons labelled with Retinyl-palmitate in healthy human subjects. J Lip Res25 :805 –812,1984 .[Abstract]
  23. Renuka KD, Silva R, Williams CM, Lovegrove JA: Use of water-miscible retinyl palmitate as markers of chylomicrons gives earlier peak response of plasma retinyl-esters compared with oil-soluble retinyl palmitate. Br J Nutr86 :427 –432,2001 .[Medline]
  24. Monti LD, Sandoli EP, Phan VC, Piatti PM, Costa S, Secchi A, Pozza G: A sensitive and reliable method for assaying true insulin without interaction with proinsulin-like molecules. Acta Diabetol32 :57 –63,1995 .[Medline]
  25. FAO/WHO Expert Consultation: "Carbohydrates in Human Nutrition." Geneva: Food and Agriculture Organization, World Health Organization, FAO Food and Nutrition, p66 ,1998 .
  26. Lemieux S, Fontani R, Uffelman KD, Lewis GF, Steiner G: Apolipoprotein B-48 and Retinyl palmitate are not equivalent markers of post-prandial intestinal lipoproteins. J Lip Res39 :1964 –711,1998 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Guillon F, Champ M: Structural and physical properties of dietary fibres, and consequences of processing on human physiology. Food Res Int33 :233 –245,2000 .
  28. Liljeberg HGM, Grandfeldt YE, Bjork I: Products based on high fiber genotype, but not on common barley and oats, lowered post-prandial glucose and insulin responses in healthy humans. J Nutr126 :458 –466,1996 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Yokoyama WH, Hudson CA, Knuckles BE, Chiu M-C M, Sayre RN, Turnlund JR, Scheeman BO: Effect of barley ß-glucan in durum wheat pasta on human glycemic response. Cereal Chem74 :293 –296,1997 .
  30. Bourdon I, Yokoyama WH, Davis P, Hudson C, Backus R, Richter D, Knuckles B, Schneeman BO: Postprandial lipid, glucose, insulin and cholecystokinin responses in men fed pasta enriched with ß-glucan. Am J Clin Nutr69 :55 –63,1999 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Cavallero E, Empilli S, Brighenti F, Stanca AM: High (1–3, 1–4)-ß-glucan Barley fraction in bread making and their effects on human glycemic response. J Cereal Sci36 :59 –66,2002 .
  32. Jenkins AL, Jenkins DJA, Zdravkovic U, Wursch P, Vuksan V: Depression of the glycemic index by high levels of ß-glucan fiber in two functional foods tested in type two diabetes. Eur J Clin Nutr56 :622 –628,2002 .[Medline]
  33. Battilana P, Ornstein K, Minehira K, Schwarz JM, Acheson K, Schneiter P, Burri J, Jequier E, Tappy L: Mechanisms of action of ß-glucan in post-prandial glucose metabolism in healthy men. Eur J Clin Nutr55 :327 –333,2001 .[Medline]
  34. Wood PJ, Braaten JT, Scott FW, Riedel KD, Wolynetz MS, Collins MW: Effect of the dose and modification of viscous properties of oat gum on plasma glucose and insulin following an oral glucose load. Br J Nutr72 :731 –743,1994 .[Medline]
  35. Wood PJ, Beer MU, Butler G: Evaluation of role of concentration and molecular weight of oat ß-glucan in determining effect of viscosity on plasma glucose and insulin following an oral glucose load. Br J Nutr84 :19 –23,2000 .[Medline]
  36. Danone Nutritopics n.28-Slowly digestible carbohydrates. http://www.danonevitapole.com/extranet/vitapole/portail.nsf/pagacc?openform Accessed Oct. 11,2004 .
  37. Cara L, Dubois C, Borel P, Armand M, Senft M, Portugal H, Pauli AM, Bernard PM, Lairon D: Effects of oat bran, rice bran, wheat fiber, and wheat germ on post-prandial lipemia in healthy adults. Am J Clin Nutr55 :81 –88,1992 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Harrison EH, Hussain MM: Mechanisms involved in the intestinal digestion and absorption of dietary vitamin A. J Nutr131 :1405 –1408,2001 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Wilson DE, Chan IF, Ball M: Plasma lipoprotein retinoids after vitamin A feeding in normal man: minimal appearance of retinyl-esters among low density lipoprotein. Metabolism32 :514 –517,1983 .[Medline]
  40. Lenich CM, Ross C: Chylomicron remnant-vitamin A metabolism by the human hepatoma cell line HepG2. J Lip Res28 :183 –194,1987 .[Abstract]
  41. Lovegrove JA, Jackson KG, Murphy MC, Brooks CN, Zampelas A, Knapper JM, Wright JW, Gould BJ, Williams CM: Markers of intestinally-derived lipoproteins: application to studies of altered diet and meal fatty acid composition. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis9 :9 –18,1999 .[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINEHome page
D. A. Timm and J. L. Slavin
Dietary Fiber and the Relationship to Chronic Diseases
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, June 1, 2008; 2(3): 233 - 240.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casiraghi, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Brighenti, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Casiraghi, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Brighenti, F.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS