|
|
||||||||
Department of Physiology and Nutrition, University of Navarra (Edif. Investigación), C/ Irunlarrea, Pamplona (M.D.P., B.E.M., J.A.M.)
Red INDE, C/ Buenos Aires, Barcelona (J.M.C., I.L.-W.), SPAIN
Address reprint requests to: Prof. J. Alfredo Martínez, Dpt. Physiology and Nutrition. University of Navarra, C/ Irunlarrea s/n. 31008 Pamplona, SPAIN. E-mail: jalfmtz{at}unav.es
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Forty volunteers (age: 32 ± 7 years) participated in this parallel simple blind study (20 of them with moderate lactose intolerance). The protocol included the intake of a test meal consisting on 43Ca-labelled fresh or pasteurized yoghurt. Volunteers, in whom the calcium status was assessed, collected the 24-h urine before and after the test meal to measure the stable isotope output. The intake-related 43Ca enrichment in urine was measured by isotopic rate mass spectrometry.
Results: In lactose tolerant and intolerant volunteers taken together, the fresh yoghurt consumption resulted in a statistically higher circulating calcium levels (p = 0.028) and urinary 43Ca output (p = 0.017) than after the pasteurized yoghurt intake. The lactose maldigestion status resulted in higher urinary 43Ca excretion (p = 0.013) after the fermented milk consumption, regardless of the nature of ingested product (p = 0.887).
Conclusions: This novel and non-aggressive protocol allowed the in vivo comparison of calcium utilization from two different dairy sources, revealing a higher acute calcium assimilation from fresh as compared to the pasteurized yoghurt, in both lactose digesting and maldigesting subjects.
Key words: calcium assimilation, stable isotopes, yoghurt, lactose maldigestion
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The metabolic involvement of this mineral makes of interest to establish daily requirements [5], and to assess calcium bioavailability from different food sources [6, 7], as well as in different biological and physiological states, like pregnancy [8], childhood [9], menopause [10] or poor lactose hydrolysis capacity (lactose maldigestion), including lactose intolerance (accompanied by clinical symptoms after lactose intake) [11].
Dairy products, specifically milk, yoghurt and cheese, provide most of calcium in the typical Western diet [12]. Indeed, a number of studies have been published using different methods to evaluate calcium bioavailability from these sources [6, 13–14]. In fact, calcium absorbability, or the availability of calcium for absorption by the intestines, is the first step towards bioavailability, which also depends on incorporation of absorbed calcium into bone, urinary excretion and faecal loss of endogenous calcium, physiological factors, particularly hormones, and certain types of food [15].
Single meal studies have been performed in humans to measure calcium absorption using tracer methods, by including a radioisotope in the test meal. In this way, radioactivity is monitored in the whole body [16] or from blood samples [17] to assess calcium assimilation, defined as the process of digestion and absorption in the gastrointestinal tract [18].
The hazards related to radioactivity led to devise methods applying stable isotopes as tracers to evaluate calcium utilization from different foods, following different approaches [19–21]. Among them, stable isotope single-tracer protocols have been developed to perform comparative analyses of in vivo calcium availability from different foods [17].
Based on these assumptions, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of moderate lactose maldigestion on calcium assimilation (digestion plus absorption in the gastrointestinal tract), comparing the effect of live yoghurt or pasteurized yoghurt intake by using the stable isotope 43Ca as tracer.
| MATERIAL AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Forty volunteers (50% of them with mild to moderate lactose maldigestion) were enrolled to participate in this trial after this biochemical characterisation (Table 1). Before the inclusion, a hydrogen breath test was carried out to confirm the lactose maldigestion degree of volunteers, since only lactose tolerant and volunteers with moderate lactose maldigestion were allowed to be included in the trial. The breath test was performed by ingestion of 25g lactose dissolved in 250 ml water [22] after a night fast (dinner at 20:00h–21:00h), beginning between 8:00h and 9:00h. The hydrogen content in breath was measured by an H2-specific electrochemical sensor (EC60 Gastrolyzer, Bendfont, UK), at baseline and after the lactose intake, at 15-minute intervals during four hours. The result was considered as positive when a 20ppm increment in breath hydrogen and/or symptoms were detected during the test period [23]. Volunteers with severe lactose maldigestion symptoms or discomfort were not enrolled in the trial based on ethical reasons. Dietary milk and dairy product intake was asked during the medical history in order to assure that the included volunteers were able to consume three yoghurts per day during three days without discomfort and a diary to register adverse effects was given to volunteers. The physician revised the diary during the visits at the Metabolic Unit to assure that no adverse effects were reported. Enrolled participants (n = 40) gave their written informed consent to be involved in this experimental trial, which was previously approved by the local Ethics Committee at the University of Navarra (Ref. 3/2004). Finally, the effect of lactose malabsorption on calcium assimilation from fresh and pasteurized yoghurt was analyzed by using the experimental data obtained from thirty-two volunteers, since eight participants did not complete the trial.
|
|
The calcium assimilation study started at 8:00 a.m. and was performed after an overnight fast. The protocol included the ingestion of the assigned test meal, fresh or pasteurized yoghurt, which contained 0.013mg/kg body weight of 43CaCO3 extrinsically incorporated by addition of the tracer to the yoghurt and homogenisation two hours before the intake as described elsewhere [24]. Blood was taken before and at 60 minutes after the ingestion of the test meal [10] to measure circulating calcium. The total calcium absorbed one hour after the ingestion was calculated by the trapezoidal area procedure: [(blood calcium (mg/dl) at fasting state + blood calcium (mg/dl) at postprandial time)/2] x sampling period (h).
Volunteers collected the 24-h urine sample before and after the labelled product ingestion to measure the 43Ca-enrichment in urine in relation to baseline excretion values (24h-urine sample recovered before the product ingestion). The 43Ca enrichment in urine was measured by isotopic rate mass spectrometry (Finnigan, Germany), and was mathematically transformed into the percentage of excreted tracer (%43Ca). Eight volunteers separately performed the whole experimental trial without 43Ca in the ingested product to take into account the natural isotope content in urine.
Statistical Analysis
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov and the Shapiro-Wilk tests were applied to explore normality of the variables. Comparison between parametric variables was evaluated using the Student t-test, while non-parametric variables were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test and the Wilcoxon matched pair test. In agreement with the experimental design, a factorial 2x2 analysis of the variance was performed to examine potential interactions between the product intake and the lactose maldigestion status based on its known robustness. Results were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation and considered statistically significant if two-sided P-values were <0.05. All statistical analyses were carried out using the SPSS 11.0 version for Windows 98 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Serum Calcium after Product Intake
The experimental design to evaluate the in vivo calcium assimilation included the measurement of circulating calcium changes in blood at 60 minutes after the yoghurt intake. In the lactose maldigesters, plasma levels of calcium statistically increased after the fresh yoghurt ingestion (9.6 ± 0.3 mg/dL vs 9.9 ± 0.4 mg/dL; p = 0.003) with no changes after the pasteurized product intake (9.4 ± 0.5 mg/dL vs 9.4 ± 0.4 mg/dL; p = 0.854). With respect to lactose digesting volunteers, circulating calcium marginally increased (9.4 ± 0.3 mg/dL vs 9.6 ± 0.4 mg/dL; p = 0.094) after the fresh yoghurt consumption, while no statistical changes were detected after the pasteurized yoghurt intake (9.6 ± 0.3 mg/dL vs 9.7 ± 0.3 mg/dL; p = 0.559). Taken together in both groups of subjects accordingly with the 2x2 factorial design, with and without lactose maldigestion, circulating calcium markedly increased (p = 0.001) one hour after the fresh yoghurt intake, while no changes (p = 0.760) were detected after the pasteurized consumption at the same postprandial time (Fig. 2).
|
|
The analysis of the variance marginally showed significant differences (p = 0.095) in urinary 43Ca enrichment depending on product intake (Table 2). After the labelled product consumption, the lactose maldigestion status involved different (p = 0.020) urinary 43Ca enrichment, regardless (p = 0.861) of the fresh or pasteurized yoghurt intake (Table 2), so volunteers with moderate lactose maldigestion showed a high (p = 0.021) urinary 43Ca enrichment (Fig. 3).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
As previously described, lactose maldigesting subjects could benefit from improved intake of calcium-rich non-dairy foods or specific dairy products if they are well tolerated, as yoghurt [29]. However, calcium utilization depends upon individual factors, such as the lactase-deficiency degree as well as on food characteristics [30]. Thus, several studies have shown that yoghurt is better tolerated than milk [11], because some lactase activity from yoghurt bacteria could participate in lactose digestion, as well as the delayed oro-cecal transit time [23, 31]. Therefore, yoghurt could allow lactose maldigesting people to comfortably consume a dairy food naturally rich in calcium.
Under our experimental conditions, the acute calcium uptake from the fresh yoghurt was higher than from the pasteurized, as evidenced by the increase in circulating plasma levels of calcium one hour after intake [31]. The heat treatment of yoghurt to increase the shelf live of the product could diminish the effect on lactose digestibility due apparently to enzymatic inactivation [32], together with the proposed effect on oro-caecal transit time, described as shorter for the pasteurized yoghurt [23]. This finding could be partially explained because calcium assimilation seems to be enhanced by lactose absorption [11]. Moreover, changes in the structure of the yoghurt related to the pasteurization process could also modify the calcium disposal. In fact, some proteins are denaturated and aggregated during the heating process, and a non-specifically binding to calcium has been described, decreasing the availability of the mineral to be absorbed [33].
Urinary calcium output can be interpreted as an indirect marker of retention, since calcium homeostasis in adults involves that the entry of this mineral from the gut equals the urinary calcium excretion on a daily basis, since other excretion routes are considered unchanged in normal subjects [34]. Based on this statement, results obtained from circulating plasma levels after intake could be supported by urinary analyses, if a steady state of calcium turnover was reached [34]. In order to maintain a comparable dynamic equilibrium, volunteers followed a adaptation period, in which the fermented dairy product consumption was avoided before the experimental intervention [35]. With respect to bone metabolism, calcium is controlled with a slow turnover, so it could be considered under strict balance with the exception of children/childhood, pregnant or ageing people, who were not included in the study. Thus, bone turnover was considered constant during the experimental period. Moreover, the study involved intra-subject comparisons (pair tests) and the experiments were carried out within 30 days. Hence, total calcium excretion in urine was considered constant and a marker of the balanced status in calcium metabolism during the intervention period.
After the acute intake of both fresh and pasteurized products, the urinary calcium output was higher in lactose maldigesting subjects as compared to controls. This observation could reflect the habitual low intake of calcium from milk products in subjects with lactose maldigestion and a lower percent absorption demands in this people [25].
We completed the assimilation study of calcium by using the single labelling method [16]. In order to reduce time-consuming procedures, aggressiveness and economic cost, we carried out a stable isotope single-tracer protocol to perform comparative analyses in vivo of calcium availability from different foods, following the principles of single meal studies by including a isotope in the test meal [17]. The 43Ca was the selected tracer based on non hazardous and non radioactive features and the possibility to quantify the enrichment in urine with a high degree of accuracy [24]. After the calcium balance homogenization of volunteers, the acute ingestion of the single-labelled yoghurt was carried out, considering changes on 43Ca enrichment in urine after the test yoghurt intake as an indirect marker of calcium assimilation. The tracer dose was fixed based on previous works [24]. The natural isotope content of volunteers, as well as the isotope enrichment due to the tested products could affect the assay. However, no changes in 43Ca-urine content were detected after the non-labelled product intake, suggesting that the adjusted tracer dose could be able to detect changes in 43Ca enrichment in urine depending on tracer assimilation [17].
The trend of a higher calcium excretion after the fresh yoghurt intake as compared to the pasteurized fermented milk, confirmed the observed increase in blood calcium levels, suggesting a higher acute bioavailability, which may be of importance in lactose intolerance as has been found for short-term leucine assimilation [36].
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received March 3, 2005. Accepted March 9, 2006.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Gaskin and J. Z. Ilich Lactose Maldigestion Revisited: Diagnosis, Prevalence in Ethnic Minorities, and Dietary Recommendations to Overcome It American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, May 1, 2009; 3(3): 212 - 218. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Minocha Probiotics for Preventive Health Nutr Clin Pract, April 1, 2009; 24(2): 227 - 241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |