JACN
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Panahi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Vuksan, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Panahi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Vuksan, V.
Journal of the American College of Nutrition, Vol. 26, No. 6, 639-644 (2007)
Published by the American College of Nutrition

β-Glucan from Two Sources of Oat Concentrates Affect Postprandial Glycemia in Relation to the Level of Viscosity

Shirin Panahi, MSc, Adish Ezatagha, MSc, Feral Temelli, PhD, Thavaratnam Vasanthan, PhD and Vladimir Vuksan, PhD

Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto (S.P., A.E., V.V.)
Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Centre and Division of Metabolism and Endocrinology, St. Michael's Hospital (S.P., A.E., V.V.), Toronto, Ontario
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta (F.T., T.V.), Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA

Address reprint requests to: Vladimir Vuksan, PhD, University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nutritional Sciences, Toronto, ON, M5S 3E2, CANADA. E-mail: v.vuksan{at}utoronto.ca


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Objective: Soluble dietary fiber has been shown to attenuate the postprandial rise in blood glucose levels and reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. This effect seems to be related to its rheological properties including viscosity. We examined the intra-fiber variability between two different processing methods of concentrating β-glucan from oats (aqueous vs. enzymatic) in relation to the level of viscosity of β-glucan and its effect on postprandial glycemia in healthy individuals.

Design: In an acute, randomized, double-blind, crossover study, 11 healthy subjects (gender: 5M:6F; age: 34 ± 5 years; BMI: 23 ± 0.8 kg/m2) were randomly assigned, on three separate occasions, to consume one of three fiber-matched treatments along with a 75g oral glucose drink. The enzymatically processed β-glucan (Oat-A) differed from β-glucan processed through the aqueous method (Oat-B) solely with regard to viscosity. Finger-prick capillary blood samples were obtained at fasting and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min after the start of the test drink. The viscosities of the fiber drinks were determined (Paar Physica UDS200 viscometer).

Results: Rheological measurements demonstrated that Oat-A had a significantly higher viscosity than Oat-B and control at 5, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min (p < 0.001). The incremental area under the glucose curve (AUC) on Oat-A was 19.6% and 17% lower than that of Oat-B and control, respectively (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: This study shows that processing oat β-glucan through enzymatic, rather than by aqueous methods, preserves the viscosity and improves postprandial glycemic control.

Key words: β-glucan, viscosity, postprandial glycemia, healthy individuals

Abbreviations: M = males • F = females • BMI = body mass index


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
It has been repeatedly demonstrated that daily consumption of soluble dietary fiber can significantly reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease [1]. This is due in part to the ability of fiber to reduce postprandial glycemia and improve long-term glycemic control [2,3]. It is hypothesized that the rheological properties of soluble dietary fiber are highly related to its effects on glucose control [4]. For instance, the ability of oat-derived β-glucan to reduce postprandial glycemia has been strongly correlated with its viscosity [5], demonstrating an inverse linear relationship between the logarithm of viscosity measures and peak postprandial plasma glucose and insulin responses after consuming various doses of purified oat β-glucan with a 50g oral glucose load. Despite these findings, the levels of viscosity required to achieve specific glucose-lowering effects are poorly understood. Still, the majority of trials investigating dietary fiber have not accounted for the principles of polysaccharide solubility and viscosity as the main determinants of its physiological outcome. While a small number of studies have shown the inter-fiber variability in viscosity [3], none have compared the intra-fiber variability or the differences in viscosity within the same type of fiber.

In order to increase the physiological effectiveness of oat β-glucan concentrates, a unique technology has been developed to increase their β-glucan content while maintaining its native molecular weight and thus, viscosity. The current study investigated oat β-glucan concentrates produced by two processing methods: the first is an aqueous process conventionally used to extract β-glucan by solubilizing it in large quantities of water; the second is a novel process which is an alcohol-based enzymatic technique used to concentrate the native cell walls containing the β-glucan. While the aim of both procedures is to remove the starch and protein components of the oats, the second process aims to obtain a fiber concentrate of high viscosity by preserving the native state of β-glucan, whereas the β-glucan can be degraded upon solubilization in the first process due to high shear and endogenous enzyme activity.

The purpose of this study was to examine the intra-fiber variability between these two methods of β-glucan concentration by (1) investigating the effect of two sources of oat β-glucan concentrates on postprandial glycemia in healthy individuals and to (2) explore the levels of viscosity required to achieve glucose-lowering effects.


    SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Subjects
Eleven healthy subjects (gender: 5M:6F, age: 34 ± 5 years; BMI: 23 ± 0.8 kg/m2) were recruited through hospital advertisements. All subjects gave written, informed consent to take part in the study, which was approved by the St. Michael's Hospital Research Ethics Board.

Treatments
Subjects received a total of three treatments in a double-blind, randomized order. The tests included 300 ml of an oral glucose drink (75g-Glucodex®, Chambly, QB) diluted with 150 ml of water added to either 10.17 g of Oat-B (6g of β-glucan; concentrate obtained by an aqueous extraction process), 11.05 g of Oat-A (6g of β-glucan; concentrate obtained by an alcohol-based enzymatic process) or a combination of 8 g fructooligosaccharide and 3 g of wheat bran (control). Seventy-five grams of glucose was the standard dose administered according to WHO guidelines. The treatments were almost identical in energy and macronutrient composition. The beverages were prepared by slowly adding the fiber to 150 mL of water while stirring to ensure that it was mixed uniformly and then adding 300 mL of Glucodex®. The drink was administered to subjects in the mixing cup immediately following preparation. Subjects were asked to consume the entire beverage over 5 min. The weighing, mixing and preparation of the three treatments were performed by a blinder independent from the study, who also performed the randomization using a randomization table. Subjects were blinded by providing them with the treatments in two equal portions so that they were not left to gel and they were allotted 5 min to consume the treatment drinks.

Protocol
Subjects attended the Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Centre at St. Michael's hospital on three separate mornings following a 10–12 h overnight fast. A minimum of 3 days separated each visit to eliminate any carry-over effects. Subjects were instructed to maintain the same dietary and exercise patterns the evening before each visit. To ensure that these instructions were followed, subjects completed a questionnaire detailing pre-session information about their diet and lifestyle patterns. Before the beginning of each test, subjects' height (m) and weight (kg) were measured and each subject gave approximately 250µL of a fasting finger-prick capillary blood sample, using a Monoejector Lancet device (Owen Mumford Ltd., Woodstock, Oxon, England). One of the three treatments was then administered. Additional finger-prick blood samples were obtained at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min after the start of the treatment. All samples were collected in tubes containing fluoride oxalate and immediately frozen at –20°C pending analysis.

Blood Glucose Analysis
All samples were analyzed within three days of collection. The glucose concentration of each was determined by the glucose oxidase method using a YSI 2300 Stat glucose/L-lactate analyzer, model 115 (Yellow Springs, Ohio).

Viscosity Determination
Corresponding amounts of the fiber ingredients were blended into 15 mL of water followed by 30 mL of Glucodex®. In order to illustrate the viscosity changes over time, drinks were held in a water bath at 37°C for up to 2 h (duration of glycemic response testing). Throughout this holding period, tubes containing the beverage samples were inverted 2–3 times every 10 min to provide a gentle mix in an effort to mimic body conditions, rather than continuous stirring with a magnetic stirrer since the mixing is rather vigorous even at the lowest setting. Samples were removed from the water bath at the end of the holding time, centrifuged (3000 x g for 10 min) and the viscosity of the supernatant was determined using a Paar Physica UDS 200 viscometer (equipped with a cup and bob double gap geometry and Peltier heating system) at 37°C and different shear rates. The samples were centrifuged to remove insoluble solids due to the sensitivity of the narrow double gap geometry of the rheometer. Therefore, the viscosity of the whole drink may be higher; however, the viscosity of the supernatant as determined in this test represents the soluble fraction thickened mainly by β-glucan.

Statistical Analyses
A power calculation was carried out in order to select the number of subjects required to participate in the study. Differences in postprandial blood glucose were detected with 80% power at a level of p < 0.05 (two-tailed) by the number of subjects. Blood glucose curves were plotted as the incremental change in blood glucose over time and the positive incremental area under the curve (AUC) was calculated geometrically for each subject, ignoring areas below the fasting blood glucose value [6]. Incremental blood glucose concentrations were used to control for baseline/fasting differences between the treatments. Statistical analyses were then performed using the Number Cruncher Statistical System (NCSS statistical software, Kaysville, Utah). Repeated measures two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) assessed interactive and independent effects of treatment (Oat-A vs. Oat-B vs. control) as well as viscosity (Oat-A vs. Oat-B vs. control). Pairwise differences in AUC and incremental glycemia at each time point (15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120 min) between the treatments were assessed by repeated measures one-way ANOVA adjusted for multiple comparisons with the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test. All results were expressed as mean ± SD and considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
All subjects completed all treatments without difficulty. Questionnaires revealed that subjects ate a minimum of 150g of carbohydrate each of the three days before the three sessions and that evening activities, amount of sleep, reported feelings of health and well-being, mode of transportation to the clinic, and weight did not differ between the sessions with each subject. There were also no complaints about the nature of the β-glucan drinks nor any side effects from consumption of the drink during the test or within 24 h following the test. The subjects consumed all of the treatment drinks in the allotted 5 min for each test.

Viscosity measurements for the 3 treatments are shown, where the centipoise (cps) was used as a unit of absolute viscosity (Fig. 1). Rheological measurements demonstrated that Oat-A had a significantly higher viscosity than Oat-B and control at 5, 15, 30, 60 and 120 min (p < 0.001) using two-way repeated measures ANOVA.


Figure 1
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Comparison of viscosity measurements of Oat-A (enzymatically processed β-glucan), Oat-B (β-glucan processed through the aqueous method) and a matched wheat bran and fructooligosaccharide control at 5, 15, 30, 60 and 120 min. Viscosity was determined at 37°C and 12.9 s–1 shear rate. (Repeated measures one-way ANOVA adjusted for multiple comparisons by the Tukey-Kramer procedure, p < 0.001).

 
Incremental postprandial blood glucose was lower, but not significant, at the peak glucose concentration occurring at 30 min (p < 0.07) on Oat-A compared with Oat-B and control (Fig. 2). Changes in area under the curve (AUC) for blood glucose, following the administration of one of the β-glucan treatments or control together with a 75g oral glucose drink is shown in Fig. 3. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA indicated differences in the effect of treatment (Oat-A vs. Oat-B vs. control). Postprandial glucose AUC was significantly reduced (p < 0.01) after Oat-A (193 ± 58 min · mmol/L) compared to Oat-B and control (240 ± 72 min · mmol/L and 232 ± 70 min · mmol/L, respectively). These differences represented a 19.6% reduction between Oat-A and Oat-B and a 17% reduction between Oat-A and control. There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between Oat-B and control.


Figure 2
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Comparison of incremental changes in postprandial glycemia of subjects given the Oat-A, Oat-B and control administered together with a 75g oral glucose drink in healthy subjects (n = 11). Incremental glycemia was lower at 30 min, although not significant (Repeated measures one-way ANOVA adjusted for multiple comparisons by the Tukey-Kramer procedure, p < 0.07).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Comparison of area under the blood glucose curve (AUC) from subjects given the Oat-A, Oat-B and control administered together with a 75g oral glucose drink in healthy subjects (n = 11). Bars with different letters are significantly different (Repeated measures one-way ANOVA adjusted for multiple comparisons by the Tukey-Kramer procedure, p < 0.01).

 

    DISCUSSION
 
This study is the first to investigate the acute glycemic-lowering effects of β-glucan concentrated with a novel technology that specifically targets the preservation of its rheological properties. The results from this study demonstrated a significant reduction in postprandial blood glucose after the ingestion of Oat-A; the treatment with the highest viscosity. Beta-glucan has been shown to decrease plasma glucose concentrations following a single meal in both healthy individuals and those with type 2 diabetes [7]. These results support earlier work, which attributes the reduced glucose response to β-glucan's ability to increase the viscosity of intestinal digesta [8]. Therefore, it is essential that the isolation and concentration of β-glucan preserve its native physicochemical properties, especially its molecular weight and physiological solubility that influence the solution viscosity of β-glucan.

Consumption of β-glucan with a meal increases the viscosity of the food bolus in the alimentary tract [8]. The increased viscosity is thought to reduce the absorption rate of the digested nutrients from the small intestine by resisting the convective effects of intestinal contractions and thus decreasing the postprandial glucose and insulin peaks [13]. This effect is thought to be proportional with the level of fiber viscosity [3,9], defined as the resistance to flow, or "stickiness", that enables fibers such as β-glucan to form a viscous slurry in the gastrointestinal tract [14,15]. Increased viscosity of the intestinal contents also impedes bulk diffusion from the lumen to the surface of the small intestine, due to an increase in thickness of the unstirred water layer [10], and perhaps due to delayed gastric emptying [11].

Oats was one of the first functional foods approved for health claim by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) because it has been studied extensively. Specifically, it is claimed that the consumption of oat and oat products containing 0.75 grams of β-glucan per serving can reduce the risk of heart disease [12]. The FDA accepts that viscosity is a major physicochemical property responsible for the physiological effects of soluble fiber [16]. This recognition is based on the fact that not all clinical studies evaluated by the FDA [12] resulted in positive outcomes and that physicochemical properties of β-glucan can be significantly affected by processing treatments. There is growing interest in extracting β-glucan from oats and barley so that it can be incorporated into a variety of food products, since it is not realistic to consume the recommended 3g β-glucan/day [12] based on oats alone over extended periods of time.

Conventional methods of concentrating β-glucan involve aqueous extraction processes whereby large quantities of water are required to solubilize β-glucan. The resulting β-glucan concentrates from these conventional methods show lower viscosity upon resolubilization in water, as demonstrated in the current study with Oat-B. This may result from the high shearing involved in processing and endogenous enzymes present in the grains, such as cellulase and β-glucanase which hydrolyze the β-glucan molecule, altering its molecular weight and therefore, its ability to form viscous solutions. Thus, the quality of β-glucan is degraded. A recently developed novel technology concentrates β-glucan using an alcohol-based enzymatic technique. In this process, grain flour is slurried in aqueous ethanol and treated with special enzyme cocktails to hydrolyze protein and starch. Subsequently, the β-glucan enriched cell wall fiber particulates that are freed from starch and protein are recovered by simple filtration techniques. In the presence of alcohol, β-glucan is not solubilized and remains intact within the cell wall. This technology yields fiber concentrates with superior β-glucan characteristics (i.e. higher molecular weight and viscosity) than those produced through aqueous techniques as demonstrated with Oat-A. Since β-glucan is not solubilized from cell walls, potential hydrolysis by endogenous enzymes such as cellulose and β-glucanase is minimized. As a result, β-glucan concentrations of up to 60% (w/w on a dry weight basis) can be obtained by this technology that preserves the physicochemical properties of native β-glucan. Viscosity measurements thus confirmed our hypothesis that Oat-A had a higher viscosity than Oat-B and control (Fig. 1) and that there was a reduction in postprandial blood glucose (Figs. 2 and3).

A review of clinical studies shows that there have been less clear relationships between polysaccharide viscosity and glycemic response. The data from this study are in agreement with Wood et al. [17] indicating that rheological properties such as viscosity are more important in determining the physiological effects of fiber than the type and quantity of fiber, however, this study examines the glycemic-lowering effects of β-glucan concentrated with an enzymatic technology that specifically targets the preservation of viscosity. The findings have shown that this concentration process can be successful in maintaining the viscosity and physiological effects of native β-glucan without any degradation. There have been previous reports relating viscosity and the dose of β-glucan to glycemic control, however, this study emphasizes that even with the same dose of β-glucan, viscosities may differ due to the type of processing method - a factor that may influence the amount and properties of β-glucan. Our data is similar to data presented in other literature; however, there is inadequate information on the bioavailability of β-glucan, which makes comparison among the studies difficult. Selecting the process of concentration is important in the preservation of the β-glucan molecule. Beta-glucan is a cell wall component of cereal grains and exists in appreciable amounts in barley (up to 15%, w/w) and oat (up to 7%, w/w). A number of clinical studies have demonstrated the positive health benefits (i.e. lowering of blood cholesterol, regulation of blood glucose levels and stimulation of the immune system) of increasing the level of oat or barley β-glucans to physiologically effective concentrations in the human diet.

Implications of these findings are promising. The effect of various processing conditions on the physicochemical properties of oat β-glucans such as viscosity and how such effects influence hyperglycemia and conditions including hyperlipidemia and other risk factors for diabetes and cardiovascular disease are certainly important topics for further research. As well, there is a growing interest in extracting β-glucan from oats so that it can be incorporated into a variety of food products, however, findings in the liquid form may not be universally applied to the solid form. Little is known about the behavior of β-glucan in different food matrices and recent findings only show an inconsistent effect of β-glucan when administered in different forms [18]. This is subject to future investigations. To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare two oat β-glucan concentrates with similar chemical compositions, but different viscosities. This study emphasizes the importance of processing methods in the production of oat β-glucan concentrates in preserving the viscosity of β-glucan, thus increasing the efficacy of such products in reducing postprandial glycemia.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Each author was involved in some aspect of the design, whether in relation to conception of the study (VV) or to method development (all authors), and was involved in study conduct, data analysis, and the final manuscript. The authors thank Vincent Chau and Vivian Cornelius for their assistance during the study. The authors also thank Cevena Bioproducts Inc. for providing both study materials.


    FOOTNOTES
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Supported by funds from the Alberta Agriculture Food and Rural Development (AAFRD), Alberta Crop Industry Development Fund Inc., Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, Alberta Barley Commission, AVAC Ltd.

Disclosure: None of the authors had a conflict of interest.

Received March 18, 2006. Accepted September 6, 2006.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 


  1. Wursch P, Pi-Sunyer FX: The role of viscous soluble fiber in the metabolic control of diabetes. A review with special emphasis on cereals rich in beta-glucan. Diabetes Care20 :1174 –1180,1997 .

  2. Vuksan V, Sievenpiper JL, Xu Z, Wong EY, Jenkins AL, Beljan-Zdravkovic U, Leiter LA, Josse RG, Stavro MP: Konjac-mannan and American ginseng: emerging alternative therapies for type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Nutr20 :370S –380S,2001 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Leeds AR, Gassull MA, Haisman P, Dilawari J, Goff DV, Metz GL, Alberti KG: Dietary fibers, fiber analogues, and glucose tolerance: importance of viscosity. Brit Med J1 :1392 –1394,1978 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Hallfrisch J, Behall KM: Mechanism of the effects of grains on insulin and glucose responses. J Am Coll Nutr19(Suppl 3) :S320 –S325,2000 .

  5. Wood PJ, Braaten JT, Scott FW, Riedel KD, Wolynetz MS, Collins MW: Effect of the dose and modification of viscous properties of oat gum on plasma glucose and insulin following an oral glucose load. Brit J Nutr72 :731 –743,1994 .[Medline]

  6. Wolever TMS, Jenkins DJA, Jenkins AL, Josse RG: The glycemic index: methodology and clinical implications. Am J Clin Nutr54 :846 –854,1991 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Tappy L, Gugolz E, Wursch P: Effects of breakfast cereals containing various amounts of β-glucan fibers on plasma glucose and insulin responses in NIDDM subjects. Diabetes Care19 :831 –834,1996 .[Abstract]

  8. Englyst HN, Cummings JH: Digestion of the polysaccharides of some cereal foods in the human small intestine. Am J Clin Nutr42 :778 –787,1985 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  9. Bourdon I, Yokoyama W, Davis P, Hudson C, Backus R, Richter D, Knuckles B, Schneeman BO: Postprandial lipid, glucose, insulin, cholecystokinin, responses in male subjects fed barley pasta enriched in beta-glucan. Am J Clin Nutr69 :55 –63,1999 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  10. Flourie B, Vidon N, Florent CH, Bernier JJ: Effect of pectin on jejunal glucose absorption and unstirred layer thickness in normal man. Gut25 :936 –941,1984 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  11. Blackburn NA, Redfern JS, Jarjis H, Holgate AM, Hanning I, Scarpello JH, Johnson IT, Read NW: The mechanism of action of guar gum in improving glucose tolerance in man. Clin Sci (London)66 :329 –336,1984 .

  12. Food and Drug Administration: "Food labeling: Health Claims: Oats and Coronary Heart Disease," Final Rule (21CFR part 101). Fed Regist (US)61(3) :296 –337,1997 .

  13. Edwards CA, Johnson IT, Read NW: Do viscous polysaccharides slow absorption by inhibiting diffusion or convection? Eur J Clin Nutr42 :307 –312,1988 .[Medline]

  14. Jenkins DJ, Kendall CW, Vuksan V: Viscous fibers, health claims, and strategies to reduce cardiovascular disease risk. Am J Clin Nutr71 :401 –402,2000 .[Free Full Text]

  15. Jenkins DJ, Kendall CW, Axelsen M, Augustin LS, Vuksan V: Viscous and nonviscous fibres, nonabsorbable and low glycaemic index carbohydrates, blood lipids and coronary heart disease. Curr Opinion Lipidol11 :49 –56,2000 .[Medline]

  16. Food and Drug Administration: "Food labeling: Health Claims: Soluble Dietary Fiber from Certain Foods and Coronary Heart Disease." Final Rule (21CFR part 101). Fed Regist (US)67(191) :61773 –61783,2002 .

  17. Wood PJ, Beer MU, Butler G: Evaluation of role of concentration and molecular weight of oat β-glucan in determining effect of viscosity on plasma glucose and insulin following an oral glucose load. Br J Nutr84 :19 –23,2000 .[Medline]

  18. Kerckhoffs DA, Hornstra G, Mensink RP: Cholesterol-lowering effect of beta- glucan from oat bran in mildly hypercholesterolemic subjects may decrease when beta-glucan is incorporated into bread and cookies. Am J Clin Nutr78 :221 –227,2003 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
K. R. Juvonen, A.-K. Purhonen, M. Salmenkallio-Marttila, L. Lahteenmaki, D. E. Laaksonen, K.-H. Herzig, M. I. J. Uusitupa, K. S. Poutanen, and L. J. Karhunen
Viscosity of Oat Bran-Enriched Beverages Influences Gastrointestinal Hormonal Responses in Healthy Humans
J. Nutr., March 1, 2009; 139(3): 461 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Panahi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Vuksan, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Panahi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Vuksan, V.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS