Journal of the American College of Nutrition, Vol 16, Issue 4 325-333, Copyright © 1997 by American College of Nutrition

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Genetic effects on bone mass and turnover-relevance to black/white differences

A. M. Parfitt
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock 72205-7199, USA.

The mass of a bone is given by its volume and its apparent density--mass per unit external volume. Most measurements of so-called density are of mass incompletely normalized by some index of bone size. Genes control about 60% to 75% of the variance of peak bone mass/density and a much smaller proportion of the variance in rate of loss. Genetic influence on bone mass/density are mediated in large part by body size, bone size, and muscle mass. Most of the fifty-fold increase in bone mass from birth to maturity is due to bone growth, which is linked to muscle growth and bodily growth. Three-D apparent bone density in the vertebrae increases about 15% during the pubertal growth spurt. The genetic potential for bone accumulation can be frustrated by insufficient calcium intake, disruption of the calendar of puberty and inadequate physical activity. The growing skeleton is much more responsive than the mature skeleton to the osteotrophic effect of exercise, which is mediated by the detection of deviations from a target value for strain, and orchestration of cellular responses that restore the target value, processes collectively termed the mechanostat. Production of metaphyseal cancellous bone and growth in length are both linked to endochondral ossification, which is driven by growth plate cartilage cell proliferation. Production of diaphyseal cortical bone and growth in width are both linked to periosteal apposition, which is driven by osteoblast precursor proliferation. During adolescence trabeculae and cortices become thicker by net endosteal apposition, which increases apparent density. Two lines of evidence support a genetic basis for black/white differences in bone mass. First, the magnitude (10% to 40%) is incommensurate with known nongenetic factors. Second, the difference is already evident in the fetus and increases progressively during growth, especially in adolescence; the difference in peak bone mass persists throughout life. The genetic determination of bone mass is mediated by two classes of gene. The first regulates growth of the body, including muscles and bones, under the control of a master gene or set of genes whose products function as the sizostat. The second regulates the increase in apparent bone density in response to load bearing, under the control of a master gene or set of genes whose products function as the mechanostat.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. L. Young and A. V. Badyaev Evolution of ontogeny: linking epigenetic remodeling and genetic adaptation in skeletal structures Integr. Comp. Biol., August 1, 2007; 47(2): 234 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Bryant, M. E. Wastney, B. R. Martin, O. Wood, G. P. McCabe, M. Morshidi, D. L. Smith, M. Peacock, and C. M. Weaver Racial Differences in Bone Turnover and Calcium Metabolism in Adolescent Females J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2003; 88(3): 1043 - 1047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.C. Manolagas, S. Kousteni, and R.L. Jilka Sex Steroids and Bone Recent Prog. Horm. Res., January 1, 2002; 57(1): 385 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Jackson and D. A. Savaiano Lactose Maldigestion, Calcium Intake and Osteoporosis in African-, Asian-, and Hispanic-Americans J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2001; 20(2): 198S - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Seeman and M. D. Growth in Bone Mass and Size--Are Racial and Gender Differences in Bone Mineral Density More Apparent than Real? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 1998; 83(5): 1414 - 1419. [Full Text]