JACN Did you know that you can get alerts when a new issue is online?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malvy, D.
Right arrow Articles by Nivet, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malvy, D.
Right arrow Articles by Nivet, H.
Journal of the American College of Nutrition, Vol. 18, No. 5, 481-486 (1999)
Published by the American College of Nutrition

Effects of Severe Protein Restriction with Ketoanalogues in Advanced Renal Failure

Denis Malvy, MD, PhD, Claude Maingourd, MD, Josette Pengloan, MD, Philippe Bagros, MD and Hubert Nivet, MD

Centre René Labusquière and INSERM U.330, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux, (D.M.)
Service de Néphrologie et Immunologie Clinique, CHU Bretonneau, Tours, (C.M., J.P., H.N.) FRANCE

Address reprint requests to: Dr. Denis MALVY, Centre René Labusquière, INSERM U 330, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, 146, Rue Léo Saignat, F-33 076 Bordeaux Cedex, FRANCE

Objective: To compare a severe protein restriction diet supplemented with ketoanalogues to a moderate protein restriction diet in order to limit glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decrease in an advanced renal insufficiency stage.

Design: Prospective randomised study conducted to compare a severe protein restriction diet (0.30 g/kg/day) supplemented with a preparation of ketoanalogues, hydroxyanalogues of aminoacids and aminoacids (Group A) to a moderate protein restriction diet (0.65 g/kg/day) (Group B).

Patients: 50 uremic patients included (25 in each group) with GFR is <20 mL/min/1.73m2.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two dietary regimens for the renal survival. But uremia decreased significantly in Group A (22.7±5.2 to 18.5±6.7 mmol/L) and increased in Group B (26.8±9.0 to 34.9±9.9 mmol/L). Calcemia increased in Group A from 2.28±0.18 to 2.42±0.17 mmol/L, p<0.01 with a stable phosphoremia while calcemia decreased in Group B (2.33±0.18 to 2.25±0.17 mmol/L, p<0.05). At the end of the study, Group A was different from Group B for calcemia (2.42±0.17 vs. 2.25±0.17 mmol/L, p<0.01), phosphoremia (1.39±0.30 vs. 1.80±0.65 mmol/L, p<0.02), alkaline phosphatase (61.42±22.93 vs. 78.8±27.0, p<0.05) and parathormone plasma levels (2.71±1.55 vs. 5.91±1.41 ng/mL, p<0.001).

Comments: Compared to a moderate protein restriction (0.65 g/kg/day), a severe protein restriction (0.3 g/kg/day) supplemented by ketoanologues does not limit GFR decrease when GFR is below 20 mL/min/1.73m2, but improves phosphocalcic plasma parameters.

Key words: uremia, protein restriction, renal failure, ketoanalogues




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
N. J. M. Cano, D. Fouque, and X. M. Leverve
Application of Branched-Chain Amino Acids in Human Pathological States: Renal Failure
J. Nutr., January 1, 2006; 136(1): 299S - 307S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
D. Fouque, P. Wang, M. Laville, and J.-P. Boissel
Low protein diets delay end-stage renal disease in non-diabetic adults with chronic renal failure
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2000; 15(12): 1986 - 1992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American College of Nutrition.