|
|
||||||||
Original Research |
Department of Physiology, Adelaide University (L.K.H.), Adelaide, South Australia, AUSTRALIA
Health Sciences & Nutrition (M.N., P.M.C.), Adelaide, South Australia, AUSTRALIA
Dr. Peter Clifton, CSIRO, Health Science and Nutrition, PO Box 10041 BC, Adelaide SA, 5000, AUSTRALIA. E-mail: peter.clifton{at}hsn.csiro.au
Objective: To determine whether glycemic index (GI) differentially affects improved glucose and lipid profiles observed during weight loss in overweight subjects previously diagnosed with type 2 diabetes with variable glucose tolerance.
Methods: Twenty-three female and twenty-two male overweight subjects participated in 12 weeks of energy restriction (average BMI 33.2 kg/m2, age 56.7 years, glycated hemoglobin (GHb) 6.7%). After a four-week run-in on a high saturated fat (SFA) diet (1540 kcal/day, 17% SFA), the free-living subjects were randomly assigned to either a high- (75 GI units) or low- (43 GI units) GI diet (1440 kcal/day, 60% carbohydrate, 5% SFA) for eight weeks. Weight, serum lipids, plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin were measured every four weeks. An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was also performed at baseline, weeks 4 and 12. From the baseline OGTT results subjects were divided into three groups of low, median and high glucose tolerance.
Results: At baseline, BMI, age and glycated hemoglobin concentrations were not different between subjects allocated to the high- or low-GI diets. After four weeks, weight loss was 3.6 ± 0.3 kg. Fasting glucose (-5.6%), glycated hemoglobin (-2.8%), area under the glucose curve (-13.0%) and triglyceride (-13.8%) concentrations were reduced (p < 0.02). Between weeks 4 and 12 reductions were observed in weight (-4.9%), fasting glucose (-4.6%), area under glucose curve (-10.1%), glycated hemoglobin (-7.2%), triglyceride (-7.5%) and LDL-C (-13.2%) concentrations. Weight loss was not different between low and high-GI diets. However, glycated hemoglobin was reduced twofold more in subjects consuming a low-GI diet as compared to subjects consuming a high-GI diet, but this was not statistically significant. LDL concentrations were also reduced more in subjects with low glucose tolerance on the low-GI diet (p = 0.02).
Conclusion: Weight loss produces substantial improvements in glycemic control and lipoprotein metabolism. Lowering the glycemic index of high carbohydrate, low fat diets increases the fall in LDL cholesterol in subjects with type 2 diabetes with low glucose tolerance, but has little effect on glycemic control.
Key words: type 2 diabetes, weight loss, lipids, glycemic index, diet, glucose tolerance
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Pal, S. Lim, and G. Egger The Effect of a Low Glycaemic Index Breakfast on Blood Glucose, Insulin, Lipid Profiles, Blood Pressure, Body Weight, Body Composition and Satiety in Obese and Overweight Individuals: A Pilot Study J. Am. Coll. Nutr., June 1, 2008; 27(3): 387 - 393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Livesey, R. Taylor, T. Hulshof, and J. Howlett Glycemic response and health a systematic review and meta-analysis: the database, study characteristics, and macronutrient intakes Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2008; 87(1): 223S - 236S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Murakami, S. Sasaki, Y. Takahashi, H. Okubo, Y. Hosoi, H. Horiguchi, E. Oguma, and F. Kayama Dietary glycemic index and load in relation to metabolic risk factors in Japanese female farmers with traditional dietary habits Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2006; 83(5): 1161 - 1169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W Krieger, H. S Sitren, M. J Daniels, and B. Langkamp-Henken Effects of variation in protein and carbohydrate intake on body mass and composition during energy restriction: a meta-regression 1 Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2006; 83(2): 260 - 274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. F. Sheard, N. G. Clark, J. C. Brand-Miller, M. J. Franz, F. X. Pi-Sunyer, E. Mayer-Davis, K. Kulkarni, and P. Geil Dietary Carbohydrate (Amount and Type) in the Prevention and Management of Diabetes: A statement by the American Diabetes Association Diabetes Care, September 1, 2004; 27(9): 2266 - 2271. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Rizkalla, L. Taghrid, M. Laromiguiere, D. Huet, J. Boillot, A. Rigoir, F. Elgrably, and G. Slama Improved Plasma Glucose Control, Whole-Body Glucose Utilization, and Lipid Profile on a Low-Glycemic Index Diet in Type 2 Diabetic Men: A randomized controlled trial Diabetes Care, August 1, 2004; 27(8): 1866 - 1872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Franz Meta-Analysis of Low-Glycemic Index Diets in the Management of Diabetes: Response to Brand-Miller et al. and Mann Diabetes Care, December 1, 2003; 26(12): 3364 - 3365. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Brand-Miller, S. Hayne, P. Petocz, and S. Colagiuri Low-Glycemic Index Diets in the Management of Diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Diabetes Care, August 1, 2003; 26(8): 2261 - 2267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Franz The Glycemic Index: Not the most effective nutrition therapy intervention Diabetes Care, August 1, 2003; 26(8): 2466 - 2468. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jimenez-Cruz, M. Bacardi-Gascon, W. H. Turnbull, P. Rosales-Garay, and I. Severino-Lugo A Flexible, Low-Glycemic Index Mexican-Style Diet in Overweight and Obese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Improves Metabolic Parameters During a 6-Week Treatment Period Diabetes Care, July 1, 2003; 26(7): 1967 - 1970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Bravata, L. Sanders, J. Huang, H. M. Krumholz, I. Olkin, C. D. Gardner, and D. M. Bravata Efficacy and Safety of Low-Carbohydrate Diets: A Systematic Review JAMA, April 9, 2003; 289(14): 1837 - 1850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Franz and J. P. Bantle Response to Irwin Diabetes Care, July 1, 2002; 25(7): 1262 - 1263. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |