|
|
||||||||
Grant Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
Address reprint requests to: Robert E. Falcone, MD, Regional Trauma Services, Grant Medical Center, 393 East Town Street, Suite 102, Columbus, OH 43215
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: This preliminary prospective clinical investigation was designed to determine whether a colorimetric carbon dioxide (CO2) indicator device (Easy-CapTM, Nellcor, Inc., Hayward, CA) attached to the proximal end of a small bore feeding tube (FT) would reliably discriminate between those tubes passed into the airways and those passed into the alimentary tract.
Methods: Ten critically ill, mechanically ventilated trauma patients requiring a FT insertion were evaluated. An Easy-CapTM device was adapted to the proximal port of each FT. Each patient had one tube inserted per the nasogastric route and then another through the endotracheal tube while the Easy-CapTM was observed for color changes consistent with the presence of CO2.
Results: All transtracheal insertions showed immediate and unambiguous color changes consistent with the presence of CO2. None of the nasogastric insertions resulted in indicator color changes and all were confirmed with radiography (sensitivity 100%, specificity 100%, accuracy 100%).
Conclusions: This preliminary report suggests colorimetric CO2 detection accurately and reliably identifies transtracheal FT insertion.
Key words: Capnometry, transtracheal feeding tube insertion
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Capnography is designed to monitor carbon dioxide expiration and is commonly used to verify endotracheal tube placement. Tubes placed within the trachea will allow expiration of carbon dioxide containing gas and will result in a normal capnography tracing. Those tubes inadvertently placed within the esophagus will not. A similar device, Easy-CapTM (Nellcor, Inc., Hayward, CA) attaches to the endotracheal tube and utilizes colorimetric indicator material to detect carbon dioxide (CO2).
This study utilized this phenomenon in a reverse manner to confirm the placement of the nasoenteric tube into the alimentary tract rather than the tracheobronchial tree by demonstrating the absence of CO2 within the tube lumen.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An Easy-CapTM device was adapted (Fig. 1) and attached in an airtight manner to the proximal end of the nasoenteric tube (Corpak Medsystems, Wheeling, IL). The outlet plug on the Easy CapTM was left in place until an insertion depth of 30 cm was obtained. The outlet plug was then removed and the indicator was observed for color changes consistent with the presence or absence of CO2. The tube was then advanced to its normal depth for nasogastric insertion and a post-insertion radiograph was obtained.
|
Patient demographics and injury severity were collected including: age, gender, mechanism of injury, Revised Trauma Score (RTS) [7], Injury Severity Score (ISS) [7], Glasgow Coma Score (GOS) [7]. Hospital Length of Stay (LOS), hospital charge, and outcome. Costs were reported as actual institutional cost. Standard formulas for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were utilized.
The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board at Grant Medical Center prior to the initiation of the study.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
All transtracheal insertions showed immediate and unambiguous color changes (yellow to purple) consistent with the presence of carbon dioxide. None of the nasoenteric insertions resulted in indicator color changes.
Use of colorimetric CO2 detection identified transtracheal insertion of nasoenteric feeding tubes with a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 100% in this group of critically ill, mechanically ventilated trauma patients.
| DISCUSSION: |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The population studied is typical of the critically ill Trauma Intensive Care population. By design, all patients were mechanically ventilated and in need of nutritional support. The Revised Trauma Score, Glasgow Coma Scale Score and Injury Severity Score are indications of physiologic and anatomic derangement [7]. An average RTS of 5.68, GCS of 9.4 and ISS of 21.8 confirm a seriously ill and injured patient population.
Nasoenteric tube placement is often initially evaluated by aspirating fluid from the proximal port [4] or by insufflating air into the tube and auscultating the abdomen for a "pseudoconfirmatory gurgle" [8]. Both of these maneuvers may yield a false-positive result [46,9]. Even pH testing of aspirated fluid is not fail-safe [4].
Radiographic imaging is commonly utilized to confirm tube position and is strongly recommended prior to initiation of enteral feeding or to the instillation of drugs or other material through the tube [3,6]. However, misinterpretation of the radiograph can occur. Hendry et al [6], reported that of 11 patients with malpositioned nasogastric tubes (all of which had radiography for tube placement confirmation) the malposition was not identified in three (27%). Tube positioning in the left costophrenic sulcus is difficult to distinguish from intragastric placement [9] especially on a supine anterior-posterior chest radiograph such as those commonly obtained in the ICU. Capnography may have a useful adjunct in this patient population.
Capnography is designed to monitor carbon dioxide expiration and is commonly used to verify endotracheal tube placement. The results are displayed on a screen as either a waveform or numerically as a percentage of CO2. The use of capnography for detection of CO2 emanating from nasoenteric tubes inadvertently placed within the airways has been suggested [10,11]. However, routine use of this specialized instrumentation is infrequent due to its expense, complexity, and lack of availability.
Another method for detection of CO2 utilizes a colorimetric indicator material enclosed within a small canister which can be attached in-line to the endotracheal tubing (Easy-CapTM, Nellcor, Inc., Hayward, CA). This study utilized this phenomenon in a reverse manner to confirm the placement of nasogastric or nasoenteric tubes into the alimentary tract rather than the tracheobronchial tree by demonstrating the absence of CO2 within the tube lumen.
In this small study population an Easy-CapTM provided a rapid unambiguous indication of endotracheal feeding tube placement which was 100% sensitive and 100% specific. The cost compared favorably to radiographic evaluation. This simple rapid and inexpensive technology might find use as an adjunct to radiographic evaluation in the emergency setting when inadvertent endotracheal feeding tube placement is suspected, but not confirmed by radiography. Further study is warranted.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received October 1, 1997. Accepted December 1, 1997.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Roberts, P. Echeverria, and S. A. Gabriel Devices and Techniques for Bedside Enteral Feeding Tube Placement Nutr Clin Pract, August 1, 2007; 22(4): 412 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Burns, R. Carpenter, C. Blevins, S. Bragg, M. Marshall, L. Browne, M. Perkins, R. Bagby, K. Blackstone, and J. D. Truwit Detection of Inadvertent Airway Intubation During Gastric Tube Insertion: Capnography Versus a Colorimetric Carbon Dioxide Detector Am. J. Crit. Care., March 1, 2006; 15(2): 188 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. C. Ellett, J. M.B. Croffie, M. D. Cohen, and S. M. Perkins Gastric Tube Placement in Young Children Clin Nurs Res, August 1, 2005; 14(3): 238 - 252. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Metheny and K. L. Meert Monitoring Feeding Tube Placement Nutr Clin Pract, October 1, 2004; 19(5): 487 - 495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |