JACN Did you know that you can get alerts when a new issue is online?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kryscio, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kryscio, R. J.
Journal of the American College of Nutrition, Vol. 18, No. 6, 620-627 (1999)
Published by the American College of Nutrition


Original Research

Long-Term Weight Maintenance after an Intensive Weight-Loss Program

James W. Anderson, MD, Satit Vichitbandra, MD, Wei Qian, MS and Richard J. Kryscio, PhD

Metabolic Research Group, VA Medical Center and University of Kentucky (HMR) Weight Management Program (J.W.A., S.V.),
Department of Statistics (W.Q., R.J.K.), University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky

Address reprint requests to: James W. Anderson, MD, Medical Service, 111C, 2250 Leestown Road, Lexington, KY 40511


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Objective: This prospective study assessed long-term weight maintenance of patients completing an intensive very-low-calorie diet (VLCD) weight-loss program.

Subjects: Individuals who had completed the 12-week core education program and lost >=10 kg were recruited.

Results: Of 154 eligible subjects, follow-up weights were obtained at >=2 years in 112 subjects (72.7%, 72 women, 40 men). Subjects had an average initial body mass index of 37.3 kg/m2 and an average weight loss of 29.7 kg in five months. Six hundred and forty-five follow-up weights (median, five per subject) were obtained over two to seven years of follow-up from clinic visits (70%) and self-report by telephone or mail (30%). Subjects regained an average of 2.5% per month of their lost weight during the first two to three years of follow-up; however, their weight stabilized over the next four years. Subjects regained an average of 73.4% of their weight loss during the first three years. The average weight loss maintained for 112 subjects was 22.8% of initial weight loss after an average of 5.3 years of follow-up. When successful weight maintenance was defined as maintaining a weight loss of 5% or 10% of initial (pre-treatment) body weight, 40% were maintaining a 5% weight loss at five years and 25% were maintaining a weight loss of 10% at 7 years. Multiple regression analyses suggested that age had a significant (p=0.004) and positive effect on weight maintenance.

Conclusions: This study suggests that weight maintenance after an intensive VLCD program is improving but still needs intensive efforts to enable most individuals to maintain a substantial percentage of their weight loss long-term.

Key words: weight loss, body mass index, very low calorie diet


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Obesity is a chronic disease which represents a major health problem in the United States and is emerging as a major health problem in many developed and developing countries [1]. In the US, an estimated 33% of adults have obesity [2], and an estimated 300,000 premature deaths annually [3] are attributed to obesity and physical inactivity. In addition to premature death, obese individuals have increased risks for coronary heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, arthritis, respiratory problems and certain types of cancer [4]. The total cost attributable to obesity in the United States was estimated at 99.2 billion dollars for 1995, which represents 5.7% of the National Health Expenditure [5].

Current treatment programs for obese individuals are not effective over the long-term. While intensive weight loss programs enable many individuals to lose 20 kg to 25 kg or 20% to 25% of their initial weight [6], long-term weight maintenance is poor [7]. Common dogma indicates that persons who successfully lose weight will regain all of their weight loss within five years [8]. Even rather heroic surgical interventions do not enable most morbidly obese individuals to achieve and maintain non-obese body weights [9].

The combination of very-low-calorie diets (VLCD) with behavior modification represents an important advance in enabling obese individuals to lose substantial amounts of weight [6]. Weight losses after VLCD and low-calorie diets (LCD) combined with behavioral approaches average 20 kg to 25 kg [6]. However, long-term weight maintenance appears to be suboptimal after these interventions, although limited follow-up information is available. Recently Wadden and colleagues [10] reported long-term maintenance data for individuals who participated in an intensive VLCD program. This study is a prospective study assessing five- to seven-year weight maintenance of 112 individuals after an intensive VLCD and behavioral modification program. At seven years, 25% of these individuals were maintaining a weight loss of more than 10% of their initial body weight.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Subjects
From January 1, 1989, through December 31, 1990, 426 obese patients who consecutively enrolled in the VLCD program at the University of Kentucky were evaluated according to a standardized protocol. Inclusion criteria were completion of twelve-week core education program, BMI>30 kg/m2, energy intake of 500 kcal/d to 800 kcal/d, weight loss of >10 kg, age 20 to 70 years, and no previous participation in an intensive VLCD program. All subjects signed an informed consent form before they began the VLCD program, and the University of Kentucky Institutional Review Board approved this research for human subjects.

Program
During the weight-loss phase (the VLCD program), all subjects were instructed to abstain from food and consume at least 520 kcal/day in the form of five chocolate or vanilla liquid supplements plus two vitamin-mineral tablets daily. This intake provided 100% to 150% of the US Recommended Dietary Allowance [11] of most vitamins and minerals. The nonfat, dry-milk-based supplement, HMR 500 (Health Management Resources, Inc., Boston, MA) provided 50 g protein, 79 g carbohydrate, 1 g fat, and 1.5 g fiber daily [6].

In addition to weekly medical monitoring, trained health educators conducted weekly 90-minute group classes including a 12- to 14-week core education program that all subjects were encouraged to complete [12]. These classes emphasized the skills needed for long-term weight maintenance, including physical activity, environmental control and estimation of energy and portion sizes of foods. Participants were instructed to keep records of supplement and energy intake and energy expended in physical activity and to complete weekly totals with calculation of energy balance. These records were reviewed weekly by program staff. When subjects reached their self-determined goal weight or wished to discontinue the weight-loss phase, low-fat foods were gradually reintroduced over a four- to six-week period while medical monitoring and group education classes were continued.

After completing the weight-loss phase, subjects were encouraged to participate in the maintenance phase of the program for a minimum of 18 months [12]. Weekly small-group sessions focused on individual procedures for preventing weight regain by using records to confront perceived "failures," such as food binges, stress eating and snacking. Subjects also attended monthly large-group seminars and participated in periodic restaurant meals and grocery shopping tours designed for practical application of weight management skills. Subjects were encouraged to practice healthy behaviors, which included a low-fat, high-fiber diet, regular exercise and record keeping of food intake and physical activity.

Subjects failing to maintain their weight loss or desiring further weight loss were encouraged to reenter special "restart" classes tailored to the needs of former VLCD participants. These participants are termed "restarts."

Follow-up
Between June, 1993, and June, 1996, we actively sought information on the current weight of each subject. All follow-up weights in the Weight Management medical record were recorded. We also reviewed other Medical Center charts to obtain weights of participants receiving medical care at this facility. We requested weights by telephone and mail from participants who were no longer active in the program. All subjects reachable by phone were interviewed, current weight information was requested, and they were invited to visit the clinic for measurement of current weight. We wrote personal letters to subjects and requested that they mail us information on their current weight. As a final follow-up, we mailed a $10 check to all subjects for whom we had a current address and asked them to record their weight on the comment section of the check before cashing it.

Subjects were classified as "successful" if they maintained a weight loss of >=5% or 10% of their enrollment (pre-treatment) weight at the time interval being analyzed. If multiple weights were available, the last available weight during each time period was assessed. Since most of the weights used for analysis were measured in the clinic, as opposed to "self-reported," we did not distinguish between measured weights and "self-reported" weights and did not make adjustments for "self-reported" weights.

Statistical Analysis
Baseline characteristics among groups based on BMI, age, enrollment weight, weight loss, duration in VLCD program and duration in maintenance program were compared by one-way analysis of variance.

Preliminary analysis indicated that weight maintenance was best described by a two-segment line indicating that the rate of weight regain was more rapid during the early period, but was more stable during the later period. The equation for this two-segment line was:

where y=(weight loss in follow-up)/(weight loss in weight loss phase) x 100; x=months of follow-up; d=month at which rate of weight change changed; a=rate of weight change before d; b=intercept of the first line segment; c=rate of weight change after d; f=intercept of the second line segment. While multiple weights were available for most subjects, the two-segment analysis was based on these three weights: the weight at completion of the weight loss phase, the weight closest to three years of follow-up, since this was the average "d" or time when the rate of weight change changed, and the weight at the last follow-up point. All weights were expressed as percent of initial weight.

Two-tailed t tests assuming unequal variances were used to compare differences in percentage weight maintenance among groups at three and five years. Mean age, BMI and other weight loss endpoints were compared among these four groups: non-restart women, restart women, non-restart men and restart men. These comparisons were done by using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedure with post hoc comparison of means for pre-selected constructs based on Fisher’s protected least significant differences procedure. Covariates potentially affecting long-term weight maintenance (gender, age, initial BMI, weight loss, length of time in weight loss, length of time in maintenance and whether or not the patient participated in restart) were examined by multiple regression analysis.

Statistical analyses were performed by using Statistica for Windows (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK) and SAS software (SAS Institute, Inc., NC). A p value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Subject Characteristics
Of the 426 consecutive subjects who enrolled in the program, 272 subjects were excluded from analysis. The eligibility criteria were established before initiating data analysis and were not changed during analysis. Subjects were not included in the follow-up analysis for the following reasons: failure to complete the twelve-week core program (202 subjects), BMI <30 kg/m2 (27 subjects), weight loss of fewer than 10 kg (twelve subjects), previous enrollment in an intensive VLCD program (14 subjects), age less than 20 years or greater than 70 years (seven subjects), death of an individual before follow-up weights were obtained (three subjects) and address unavailable (seven subjects). Of the 154 subjects who met these criteria, follow-up weights of two years or more were obtained on 112 subjects (72.7%).

Table 1 provides the baseline characteristics of the subjects that included 72 women and 40 men. Eighty-nine subjects (79.5%, 59 women and 30 men) were classified as "non-restart" because they did not participate in an intensive weight loss program during the period of follow-up. Twenty-three subjects (20.5%, 13 women and 10 men) were classified as "restarts" because they enrolled at least one time in our intensive weight loss "restart" program during the period of observation. BMIs averaged 37.3 kg/m2 for the entire group; men had higher average BMIs than women, and the BMIs of men who restarted were significantly higher than those of the other groups. The average age was 45.8 years and was similar in both subgroups of women and in the male non-restart group; the male restart subgroup was significantly younger than other subgroups. Enrollment weights were significantly higher in men than in women.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Subjects. Values are Mean (SEM). Values in the Same Row with Different Superscripts Differ Significantly from Each Other

 
Weight Loss
Weight loss averaged 29.7 kg for the entire group (Table 1). Men who subsequently re-enrolled in restart lost significantly greater amounts of weight than did non-restart men or women. The average duration of the weight loss period for the entire group was five months. Non-restart men participated for the shortest period of time, and restart women participated for the longest period of time. The average duration of time in the maintenance program after completing weight loss and a four- to six-week re-feed period was 8.7 months. Although women stayed in maintenance longer than men and restart men participated in maintenance longer than non-restart men, these differences were not significantly different.

Follow-up Weights
After completion of weight loss, 645 follow-up weights were obtained for the 112 subjects (median of five weights/subject, range of two to 23 weights/subject). Follow-up weights were obtained in clinic for 70.2% of measurements and were self-reported for 29.8% of measurements. Fig. 1 illustrates the follow-up weights. Weight maintenance was plotted in kilograms, indicating an initial weight loss of 29.7 kg (100%) at zero years. Over the first three years subjects regained weight rapidly. However, between three and five years the weight loss in kilograms was fairly stable at approximately eight kilograms. The best linear fit for this pattern was a polynomial equation. Because of the variable number of measurements available at various time points, there is some fluctuation in the percentage weight maintenance that was especially noteworthy at five years.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Weight loss maintained over seven years expressed in kg and as percentage. Curvilinear line is the polynomial fit to the % weight loss maintained.

 
At years three to seven subjects were maintaining the following percentages of initial weight loss: three years, 26.6% (n=76 subjects having measurements at this time point); four years, 22% (n=38); five years, 19.9% (n=15); six years, 18.5% (n=42); and seven years, 17.9% (n=32). Fifty-two subjects (46% of all subjects) had measurements >=60 months of follow-up (the average was 73 months). At this time point, 24 women were maintaining an average of 19.1% (±9.5%, SEM) of their weight loss and 28 men were maintaining an average of 16.3% (±11.0%) of their weight loss (p=0.85). For these 52 subjects there were no significant differences in weight maintenance for restarts versus non-restarts. The last available weight for the 112 subjects at an average of 5.3 years of follow-up showed that subjects were maintaining an average of 22.8% of their weight loss.

Successful Weight Maintenance
Defining successful weight maintenance as maintaining a weight loss of more than 10% of initial body weight which represents an average of approximately 11 kg (see Table 1), Fig. 2 illustrates success rates between one and seven years. Women and men had approximately the same success rates, with variations related primarily to variable numbers of subjects available at each observation point. By three years, approximately 31% remained successful, and this success rate was maintained fairly well through seven years with values being 25% successful for both women and men. Success rates were also calculated at the 5% weight maintenance level. Weight maintenance at 5% loss of initial body weight were as follows: 50.4% at three years (n=76); 61.8% at four years years (n=38); 40% at five years (n=15); 49.2% at six years (n=42); and 34.7% at seven years (n=32). Meaningful differences in success rates between women and men were not noted.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Successful weight maintenance of 10% of initial body weight over seven years. Numbers at top of bars represent number of subjects with weights available at each time point. Data for men are in solid bars and women are in open bars.

 
Two-Segment Model of Weight Maintenance
A two-segment linear model was developed for 94 subjects who had at least three observations at the appropriate time intervals for calculation of their individual regression lines. This included 63 women (13 restart) and 33 men (10 restart). This model is consistent with Fig. 1, where all available data are plotted and with the polynomial fit for the percentage weight maintenance. The initial slope was negative (-2.542% per month), while the second slope was essentially flat (+0.0065% per month). This model suggested that, on average, subjects regained 2.5% per month of their initial weight loss over the first 24 to 36 months of follow-up and maintained a stable weight over the next three to five years of follow-up.

Multiple Regression Analysis
A multiple regression analysis was performed using weight maintenance at three and five years as the dependent variables. The two-segment model calculated weights at years three and five; thus, for these analyses 94 weights (61 women and 33 men) were available at years three and five. The independent variables assessed were gender, age, initial BMI, weight loss in VLCD program, months in VLCD program, months in maintenance program and group (non-restart vs. restart). None of these variables were significantly related to weight maintenance at three years. Although the regression lines were not statistically significant at three years (p=0.062 to p=0.118), the association between weight loss and weight maintenance at three years were significant (p=0.031 to p=0.040). Multiple analyses using different combinations of these variables consistently indicated that age had a significant and positive correlation with weight maintenance at five years (p=0.012 to p=0.005). Because of the large variance in percentage weight maintenance, however, the regression lines were not statistically significant with the lowest p value being 0.052. These analyses also suggested that group (non-restart vs. restart) approached statistical significance (p=0.053 to p=0.064). Although neither regression model appeared to be statistically significant, the only strong association observed was that older individuals appears to maintain weight loss better than younger individuals.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We obtained 645 follow-up weights on 112 subjects at time intervals of two to seven years after they had completed an intensive weight-loss program during which they lost >=10 kg. Initial BMIs averaged 37.3 kg/m2 and were similar for women and men. Weight loss averaged 29.7 kg over an average period of five months. Weight regain was rapid and averaged 73% of the weight lost over three years after completing the weight-loss program. However, between three to seven years, the body weights were fairly stable with weight maintenance averaging 26.6% to 17.9% of weight loss. Successful weight maintenance at levels of 10% and 5% of initial body weight were examined. At the 10% level, 31% at three years and 25% at seven years were maintaining a weight loss >=10% of their initial body weight; values were similar in women and men. At the 5% level, 50% at three years and 40% at five years were maintaining a weight loss >=5% of their initial body weight. Women and men did not differ significantly for these values. When we analyzed the last available weight for 112 subjects, they were maintaining a weight loss of 23% of their initial weight loss at an average of 5.3 years.

Our results were appropriate for analysis with a two-segment linear model. This indicated that subjects regained an average of 2.5%/month of their initial weight loss over a 24- to 36-month period after weight loss. Subsequently, they did not gain further weight, on average, since the second slope indicated a weight loss of 0.01%/month. Multivariate analyses for weight maintenance data at three and five years did not yield statistically significant regression lines. However, older individuals appeared to maintain their weight loss significantly better (p=0.004) than younger individuals. Furthermore, duration of time in the maintenance program and whether the individual participated in a restart program appeared to be related to percentage of weight loss maintained (p=0.06). Gender, initial body weight and amount of weight loss did not appear to be related to weight maintenance in this analysis.

The two-segment linear model appears to be useful in describing the weight change pattern after an intensive weight-loss program. Simple linear regression analyses for weight changes in the first three years and for years three to seven yielded similar data, with a similar intercept at approximately three years. These observations suggest that most patients rapidly regain weight over the first three years and, on average, maintain their weight fairly well over the next several years. Further analyses incorporating more extensive long-term data are required to confirm our observations that weight remains fairly stable after three years. Previous data from Bjorvell and Rossner [13] and Walsh and Flynn [14] are consistent with our observations.

Wadden and Frey [10] recently reported five-year follow-up data on patients completing a similar VLCD program. Their analysis differs from ours in these respects: their inclusion criteria required completion of 26 weeks of treatment compared to our twelve weeks; all of their weights were self-reported whereas >70% of our weights were measured and <30% were self-reported; and they obtained follow-up weights on 48% of eligible patients while we obtained values on 72% of eligible patients. As they [10] point out, long-term studies are likely to be favorably biased because unsuccessful patients are less willing to participate. Because their patient participation level was lower than ours, their results possibly are more favorably biased. Nevertheless, at five years their men were maintaining 34.6% of their weight loss and their women were maintaining 18.2% of their weight loss (data from Table 1 [10]), while our patients were maintaining an average of 19.9% of their weight loss after five years. The five-year success rates for maintaining 10% and 5% reductions in body weight can also be compared as follows: 57.9% of their men, 47.8% of their women and 40.2% of our patients were maintaining a 5% reduction at five years; 28.1% of their men, 31.3% of their women were maintaining a reduction of 10% at five years while 25% of our patients were maintaining a 10% reduction at seven years.

Our current study is consistent with many previous studies [7,1522] indicating that, even after successful weight loss of >=10 kg, most individuals are unable to maintain substantial amounts of weight loss over five years. However, this report and the report of Wadden and Frey [10] suggest that long-term results currently being achieved are better than those reported by Andersen and colleagues [8] and others [7] in the previous decade. The recent report from the National Weight Control Registry [23] also indicates that selected individuals are successfully maintaining substantial amounts of weight loss over the long-term. This unique Registry sought information on individuals who had lost >=13.6 kg and maintained that loss for at least one year. These individuals lost an average of 30 kg and maintained a minimum weight loss of 13.6 kg (>45% of initial weight loss) for an average of 5.5 years.

Predictors of long-term weight maintenance are not clearly identified because, in large part, there is a paucity of long-term data to test hypotheses. Our observations provide data for further hypothesis development. The strong positive correlation between age and long-term weight maintenance at five years is of note. Further, suggestions that the duration of time in maintenance and the participation in restart approach statistical significance require further evaluation. Our clinical observations suggesting that the amount of weight lost in the weight loss phase might correlate with percentage of weight maintained were not supported by this analysis.

As others have previously documented [24], the amount of weight being lost in intensive weight loss programs is increasing steadily. While the percentage of weight loss being maintained may not be increasing dramatically, the absolute amount of weight loss being sustained is also rising steadily. When individuals lose 9% of their initial body weight, the average for behavioral programs [24], their chances of being successful at maintaining a loss of 10% or even 5% of initial body weight are substantially less than after losing the average of 26% of initial body weight, as observed in this study. Because we excluded persons who lost <10 kg from these analyses, we may have diminished the chances of seeing a stronger correlation between initial weight loss and long-term weight maintenance.

Although the weight maintenance in this study, reflecting an average of 6.8 kg kept off at 5.3 years, is clearly suboptimal, several additional factors should be considered. First, the available data indicate that obese individuals who are not treated gain weight over the following five to ten years, although the magnitude of weight gain is not well delineated. One study [25] of middle-aged obese women in the US reported an average weight gain of 2.1 kg over a ten-year period; in another study [23], more than half the "superobese" women gained over 20% of their ideal body weight in at least one decade of life. In a research study [27], untreated control women gained 1.5 kg to 4 kg over three years. Thus, the average woman who participated in our intensive VLCD program might be expected to gain between one kilogram [25] to three kilograms [27] to six kilograms [26] during the five years of follow-up in our study. One could speculate that this hypothetical woman might weigh between eight and fifteen kilograms less at five years than she might have weighed if she had not participated in this program.

A second factor is that modest weight losses of 5% to 10% of body weight are accompanied by significant reductions in risk for developing several diseases. Recent reports persuasively indicate that modest weight gains are associated with significantly increased risks for developing coronary heart disease [28], hypertension [24] and diabetes [29]. Consistent with these observations regarding the health risks of weight gain, emerging data strongly suggest that maintenance of modest amounts of weight loss significantly decreases risk for developing diabetes [29]. A third factor relates to the significant improvements in several co-morbid diseases including diabetes [30,31], hypertension [3234] and dyslipidemia [3335], which are associated with modest weight loss.

A fourth benefit of maintaining modest amounts of weight loss may be important changes in lifestyle associated with this weight maintenance. As recently reviewed [24], predictors of good maintenance of weight loss include regular physical activity and low-fat intakes [23]. While we encourage individuals in our maintenance program to maintain physical activities levels of >=2000 kcal/week, to maintain a low fat intake, to eat five servings of vegetables and fruits daily and to keep records of physical activity and food intake until these behaviors are incorporated into their lifestyle [6], we do not have data on achievement of these goals by patients in this current study. These behaviors, however, are similar to those used by successful maintainers of significant weight loss in the National Weight Control Registry [23].

Because successful maintenance of weight loss over the long-term is difficult, additional strategies should be explored. We recently reported [36] that subjects given orlistat, a lipase inhibitor, enhanced weight maintenance over a one-year period after successful weight loss. Long-term adjunctive drug therapy may be required to enable some individuals to successfully maintain their weight loss.

In conclusion, our study indicated that individuals who successfully lost 30 kg in an intensive VLCD weight loss program rapidly regained almost 75% of their lost weight over three years after completing the program. However, weight stabilized after three years and was maintained over the next two to four years. Older patients maintained their weight significantly better than younger patients. Our 112 patients were maintaining an average of 22.3% of their weight loss after an average of 5.3 years of follow-up. When successful weight loss was defined as maintaining a weight reduction of 5% or 10% of their initial (pre-treatment) weight, 40% were maintaining a 5% weight reduction at five years and 25% were maintaining a 10% weight reduction at seven years.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Supported, in part, by Health Management Resources (HMR) and the HCF Nutrition Research Foundation.

Received December 1, 1998. Accepted June 1, 1999.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Bjorntorp P: Obesity. Lancet 350: 423–426, 1997.[Medline]
  2. Kuczmarski RJ, Flegal KM, Campbell SM, Johnson CL: Increasing prevalence of overweight among US adults: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1960 to 1991. J Amer Med Assoc 272: 205–211, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. McGinnis JM, Foege WH: Actual causes of death in the United States. J Amer Med Assoc 270: 2207–2212, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Pi-Sunyer FX: Medical hazards of obesity. Ann Intern Med 119: 655–660, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Wolf AM, Colditz GA: Current estimates of the economic cost of obesity in the United States. Obes Res 6: 97–106, 1998.[Medline]
  6. Anderson JW, Hamilton CC, Brinkman-Kaplan V: Benefits and risks of an intensive very-low-calorie diet program for severe obesity. Am J Gastroenterol 87: 6–15, 1992.[Medline]
  7. Wadden TA, Sternberg JA, Letizia KA, Stunkard AJ, Foster GD: Treatment of obesity by very low calorie diet, behavior therapy, and their combination: a five-year perspective. Int J Obes 13: 39–46, 1989.
  8. Brownell KD, Jeffery RW: Improving long-term weight loss: pushing the limits of treatment. Behav Ther 18: 353–374, 1987.
  9. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Statement: Gastrointestinal Surgery for Severe Obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 55: 615S–619S, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Wadden TA, Frey DL: A multicenter evaluation of a proprietary weight loss program for the treatment of marked obesity: A five-year follow-up. Int J Eat Disord 22: 203–212, 1997.[Medline]
  11. National Research Council: "Recommended Dietary Allowances," 10th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.
  12. Health Management Resources: "The HMR Behavioral Reference." Boston, MA: Health Management Resources, 1989.
  13. Björvell H, Rössner S: Long term treatment of severe obesity: four year follow up of results of combined behavioural modification programme. Br Med J 291: 379–382, 1985.
  14. Walsh MF, Flynn TJ: A 54-month evaluation of a popular very low calorie diet program. J Fam Pract 41: 231–236, 1995.[Medline]
  15. Jeffery RW, Bjornson-Benson WM, Rosenthal BS, Lindquist RA, Kurth CL, Johnson SL: Correlates of weight loss and its maintenance over two years of follow-up among middle-aged men. Prev Med 13: 155–168, 1984.[Medline]
  16. Wadden TA, Stunkard AJ, Liebschutz J: Three-year follow-up of the treatment of obesity by very low calorie diet, behavior therapy, and their combination. J Consult Clin Psychol 56: 925–928, 1988.[Medline]
  17. Kramer FM, Jeffery RW, Forster JL, Snell MK: Long-term follow-up of behavioral treatment for obesity: patterns of weight regain among men and women. Int J Obes 13: 123–136, 1989.[Medline]
  18. Holden JH, Darga LL, Olson SM, Stettner DC, Ardito EA, Lucas CP: Long-term follow-up of patients attending a combination very-low calorie diet and behaviour therapy weight loss programme. Int J Obes 16: 605–613, 1992.
  19. Nunn RG, Newton KS, Faucher P: 2.5 years follow-up of weight and body mass index values in the Weight Control for Life! program: a descriptive analysis. Addict Behav 17: 579–585, 1992.[Medline]
  20. Flynn TJ, Walsh MF: Thirty-month evaluation of a popular very-low-calorie diet program. Arch Fam Med 2: 1042–1048, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hartman WM, Stroud M, Sweet DM, Saxton J: Long-term maintenance of weight loss following supplemented fasting. Int J Eat Disord 14: 87–93, 1993.[Medline]
  22. Grodstein F, Levine R, Troy L, Spencer T, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ: Three-year follow-up of participants in a commercial weight loss program. Can you keep it off? Arch Intern Med 156: 1302–1306, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Klem ML, Wing RR, McGuire MT, Seagle HM, Hill JO: A descriptive study of individuals successful at long-term maintenance of substantial weight loss. Am J Clin Nutr 66: 239–246, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Perri MG, Fuller PR: Success and failure in the treatment of obesity: Where do we go from here. Med Exerc Nutr Health 4: 255–272, 1995.
  25. Williamson DF: Descriptive epidemiology of body weight and weight change in US adults. Ann Intern Med 119: 646–649, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Hartz AJ, Rimm AA: Natural history of obesity in 6,946 women between 50 and 59 years of age. Am J Public Health 70: 385–388, 1980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Kumanyika SK, Obarzanek E, Stevens VJ, Hebert PR, Whelton PK: Weight-loss experience of black and white participants in NHLBI-sponsored clinical trials. Am J Clin Nutr 53: 1631S–1638S, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Manson JE, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, Hankinson SE, Hennekens CH, Speizer FE: Body weight and mortality among women. N Engl J Med 333: 677–685, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Colditz GA, Willett WC, Rotnitzky A, Manson JE: Weight gain as a risk factor for clinical diabetes mellitus in women. Ann Intern Med 122: 481–486, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Wing RR, Marcus MD, Salanta R, Epstein LH, Miaskewicz S, Blair EH: Effects of a very-low calorie diet on long-term glycemic control in obese type 2 diabetic subjects. Arch Intern Med 151: 1334–1340, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Anderson JW, Brinkman-Kaplan VL, Hamilton CC, Logan JB, Collins RW, Gustafson NJ: Food-containing hypocaloric diets are as effective as liquid-supplement diets for obese individuals with NIDDM. Diabetes Care 17: 602–604, 1994.[Abstract]
  32. Tuck ML, Sowers J, Dornfeld L, Kledzik G, Maxwell M: The effect of weight reduction on blood pressure, plasma renin activity, and plasma aldosterone levels in obese patients. N Engl J Med 304: 930–933, 1981.[Abstract]
  33. Higgins M, D’Agostino RD, Kannel W, Cobb J: Benefits and adverse effects of weight loss: Observations from the Framingham Study. Ann Intern Med 119: 758–763, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Anderson JW, Brinkman-Kaplan VL, Lee H, Woods CL: Relationship of weight loss to cardiovascular risk factors in morbidly obese individuals. J Am Coll Nutr 14: 256–261, 1994.
  35. Stevenson DW, Darga LI, Spafford TR, Ahmad N, Lucas CP: Variable effects of weight loss on serum lipids and lipoproteins in obese subjects. Int J Obes 12: 495–502, 1988.[Medline]
  36. Hill JO, Hauptman J, Anderson JW, Fujioka K, O’Neil PM, Smith DK, Zavoral JH, Aronne LJ: Orlistat, a lipase inhibitor, for weight maintenance after conventional dieting: a 1-y study. Am J Clin Nutr 69: 1108–1116, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CMAJHome page
K. S. Dale, K. A. McAuley, R. W. Taylor, S. M. Williams, V. L. Farmer, P. Hansen, S. M. Vorgers, A. W. Chisholm, and J. I. Mann
Determining optimal approaches for weight maintenance: a randomized controlled trial
Can. Med. Assoc. J., May 12, 2009; 180(10): E39 - E46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. W Anderson, S. B Conley, and A. S Nicholas
One hundred pound weight losses with an intensive behavioral program: changes in risk factors in 118 patients with long-term follow-up
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2007; 86(2): 301 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
A. R. Wilson and D. D. McAlpine
The Effectiveness of Screening for Obesity in Primary Care: Weighing the Evidence
Med Care Res Rev, October 1, 2006; 63(5): 570 - 598.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
N. Vogels, E. C. Mariman, F. G Bouwman, A. D. Kester, K. Diepvens, and M. S Westerterp-Plantenga
Relation of weight maintenance and dietary restraint to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma}2, glucocorticoid receptor, and ciliary neurotrophic factor polymorphisms
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2005; 82(4): 740 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. G. Tsai and T. A. Wadden
Systematic Review: An Evaluation of Major Commercial Weight Loss Programs in the United States
Ann Intern Med, January 4, 2005; 142(1): 56 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. A van Baak, E. van Mil, A. V Astrup, N. Finer, L. F Van Gaal, J. Hilsted, P. G Kopelman, S. Rossner, W P. James, and W. H. Saris
Leisure-time activity is an important determinant of long-term weight maintenance after weight loss in the Sibutramine Trial on Obesity Reduction and Maintenance (STORM trial)
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2003; 78(2): 209 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kryscio, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kryscio, R. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS