JACN Did you know that you can get alerts when a new issue is online?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slavin, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slavin, J. L.
Journal of the American College of Nutrition, Vol. 19, No. 90003, 300S-307S (2000)
Published by the American College of Nutrition

Mechanisms for the Impact of Whole Grain Foods on Cancer Risk

Joanne L. Slavin, PhD, RD

Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, 1334 Eckles Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota

Address reprint requests to: Joanne Slavin, Ph.D., Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, 1334 Eckles Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 WHOLE GRAIN FOODS
 EPIDEMIOLOGIC SUPPORT FOR THE...
 MECHANISMS FOR THE...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Dietary guidance recommends consumption of whole grains for the prevention of cancer. Epidemiologic studies find that whole grains are protective against cancer, especially gastrointestinal cancers such as gastric and colonic, and hormonally-dependent cancers including breast and prostate. Four potential mechanisms for the protectiveness of whole grains against cancer are described. First, whole grains are concentrated sources of dietary fiber, resistant starch, and oligosaccharides, fermentable carbohydrates thought to protect against cancer. Fermentation of carbohydrates in the colon results in production of short chain fatty acids that lower colonic pH and serve as an energy source for the colonocytes. Secondly, whole grains are rich in antioxidants, including trace minerals and phenolic compounds, and antioxidants have been proposed to be important in cancer prevention. Thirdly, whole grains are significant sources of phytoestrogens that have hormonal effects related to cancer protection. Phytoestrogens are thought to be particularly important in the prevention of hormonally-dependent cancers such as breast and prostate. Finally, whole grains mediate glucose response, which has been proposed to protect against colon and breast cancer.

Key words: cancer, whole grains, phytoestrogens, lignans, antioxidants, oligosaccharides

Key teaching points:

• Whole grains are a rich source of fermentable carbohydrates.

• Whole grains are concentrated in natural antioxidants.

• Whole grains are a dependable source of phytoestrogens that may protect against hormonally-dependent cancers.

• Whole grains are digested and absorbed more slowly than refined carbohydrates.

• These mechanisms, alone or together, may explain the protectiveness of whole grains in disease prevention.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 WHOLE GRAIN FOODS
 EPIDEMIOLOGIC SUPPORT FOR THE...
 MECHANISMS FOR THE...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Despite dietary recommendations to increase whole grain intake, little research has been conducted on the physiological effects of diets high in whole grains. Mechanistic studies are usually conducted with the magic bullet approach, where one dietary ingredient is isolated and fed to either animals or human subjects. Potter describes well the problems with this approach [1]. The effect of dietary ingredients will vary with the stage of the cancer process, the organ site, and will be modified by gender, age and genetic profile. Feeding whole foods makes it difficult to isolate mechanisms, but such an approach ensures the built-in redundancy of multiple agents with independent, overlapping and perhaps interactive mechanisms [1].

The objective of this review is to describe potential mechanisms whereby whole grains may protect against cancer. First, whole grains will be defined and described. Support for the relationship between whole grains and cancer protection will be highlighted. Finally, four potential mechanisms for the protectiveness of whole grains against cancer will be proposed.


    WHOLE GRAIN FOODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 WHOLE GRAIN FOODS
 EPIDEMIOLOGIC SUPPORT FOR THE...
 MECHANISMS FOR THE...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Measurement of whole grain intake is difficult since there are no accepted standards for whole grain foods. In the milling process, the bran and germ are separated from the starchy endosperm, and the latter is ground to flour. Micronutrients are generally present in higher concentrations in the outer part of the grain, so refined flours which comprise only starchy endosperm are lower in micronutrients than whole grains. Additionally, because the germ is high in unsaturated fats, it is often necessary from the perspective of shelf-life to remove the germ in order to prevent lipid oxidation.

Most whole and refined grains consumed in developed countries are processed to make acceptable products. Milling of whole grains has the most significant effect on nutrient content. When whole grain rye was milled into different fractions, the fractions varied considerably in gross chemical composition [2]. The starch content ranged from 3.0 g/100 g in the pericarp/testa to 73.3 g/100g in the endosperm. Protein, fat, ash and phosphorous were concentrated in the aleurone fraction. Dietary fiber characteristics also differed greatly between the rye milling fractions. Arabinoxylans composed the majority of dietary fiber components in all samples, but the milled fractions had different concentrations of lignin, cellulose and beta-glucans.

When the bran is removed in processing, associated substances are also removed. Phenolic acids, particularly the hydroxy-cinnamic acids, ferulic acid and p-coumaric acid, are found in plant cell walls generally linking cellulose to other polysaccharide components. These compounds are thought to decrease the fermentability of dietary fiber [3]. The total phenolic acid content of wheat, rice and oat flours ranges from 71 to 87 ppm, while maize flour contains 309 ppm [4]. Ferulic and p-coumaric acids and syringic acid are the principal phenolic acids. Oats contain a number of lipid-soluble esters of caffeic and ferulic acids, which function as natural antioxidants for the oat lipids. Ferulic acid is the most concentrated phenolic acid in wheat, and the more refined flours have lower phenolic acid contents [5].


    EPIDEMIOLOGIC SUPPORT FOR THE PROTECTIVE ROLE OF WHOLE GRAINS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 WHOLE GRAIN FOODS
 EPIDEMIOLOGIC SUPPORT FOR THE...
 MECHANISMS FOR THE...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
There is substantial scientific evidence suggesting that whole grains as commonly consumed in the United States and Europe reduce risk of cancer. Whole grain intake is difficult to assess in epidemiologic studies because existing food frequency instruments were not designed to measure this dietary component. In epidemiologic studies, various phrases have been used to identify whole grain intake including dark bread, brown bread, crisp bread, high-fiber cereal bread, whole grain bread and cereal, whole grain cereal, whole grain foods, whole grain pasta and wholemeal bread [6]. Although these classification categories are not perfect, they do allow researchers to differentiate between participants who are infrequent versus habitual or frequent consumers of whole grain products.

In a meta-analysis of whole grain intake and cancer [6], whole grains were found to be protective in 46 of 51 mentions of whole-grain intake and in 43 of 45 mentions after exclusion of six mentions with design/reporting flaws or low intake. Dose-response analyses were strong and similar for two types of dietary questionnaires, but weak for studies that used the most comprehensive questionnaires. A systemic review of case-control studies conducted using a common protocol in Northern Italy between 1983 and 1996 indicates that a higher frequency of whole grain consumption is associated with reduced risk for cancer [7]. Whole grain was consumed primarily as whole grain bread and some whole grain pasta in the Italian studies.

The relationship between colon cancer and dietary fiber intake continues to be debated. Recently it was widely reported that there was no relationship between dietary fiber intake and colon cancer in a large prospective study [8]. It should be noted that intake of dietary fiber was low in participants in the study, not unlike intake for most Americans. Additionally, dietary fiber is just one component of whole grains that is known to protect against colon cancer.


    MECHANISMS FOR THE PROTECTIVENESS OF WHOLE GRAINS IN CANCER
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 WHOLE GRAIN FOODS
 EPIDEMIOLOGIC SUPPORT FOR THE...
 MECHANISMS FOR THE...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
1. Gastrointestinal Response
Whole grains are rich sources of fermentable carbohydrates including dietary fiber, resistant starch and oligosaccharides. Undigested carbohydrate that reaches the colon is fermented by intestinal microflora to short chain fatty acids and gases. Short chain fatty acids include acetate, butyrate and propionate, with butyrate being a preferred fuel for the colonic mucosa cells. Undigested carbohydrates increase fecal wet and dry weight and speed intestinal transit.

No studies have examined the effects of whole grains on gut fermentation. Research has been conducted on grain components, including dietary fiber, resistant starch and oligosaccharides. When the dietary fiber content of various whole grains is compared, oats, rye and barley contain about one-third soluble fiber and the rest insoluble fiber. Refining of grains removes proportionally more of the insoluble fiber than soluble fiber, although refined grains are low in total dietary fiber.

Disruption of cell walls can increase fermentability of dietary fiber. Coarse wheat bran has a greater fecal bulking effect than finely ground wheat bran when fed at the same dosage [9], suggesting that the particle size of the whole grain is an important factor in determining physiological effect. Coarse bran delays gastric emptying and accelerates small bowel transit [10]. The effect seen with coarse bran was similar to the effect of inert plastic particles, suggesting that the coarse nature of whole grains as compared to refined grains has a unique physiological effect beyond composition differences between whole and refined grains. Although it is generally assumed that more refined grains will have less gastrointestinal effect, a recent study found that particle size of wheat bran did not alter effect on stool weight [11]. The smaller particle size bran did have more effect on fecal concentrations of butyrate, suggesting increased bacterial fermentation.

Several mechanisms have been proposed for the protective action of dietary fiber against cancer. Increased fecal bulk and decreased transit time allow less opportunity for fecal mutagens to interact with the intestinal epithelium. Secondary bile acids are thought to promote cell proliferation, thus allowing increased opportunity for mutations to occur and increased replication of abnormal cells. The effect of fiber on the actions of bile acids may be attributable to the binding or diluting of bile acids. Fermentation of dietary fiber results in production of short chain fatty acids which lower intestinal pH; this inhibits the conversion of primary bile acids to secondary bile acids. At low pH, the solubility of free bile acids is reduced, diminishing their availability for cocarcinogenic activity. Fermentation of dietary fiber results in production of butyrate, a short-chain fatty acid that has been shown to be antineoplastic [12]. Results of animal studies with dietary fiber have been inconsistent. Potential reasons for this inconsistency include the different types of fiber being fed to animals, species differences, different tumor-inducing agents and overwhelming levels of dietary fat, fiber or carcinogens in experiments.

Few epidemiologic studies collect biomarkers of gut function such as stool weight or transit time. Cummings et al. [13] collected data from 20 populations in 12 countries and found that average stool weight varied from 72 to 470 grams/day and was inversely related to colon cancer risk. It is known that different dietary fibers have different effects on stool weight. Wheat bran is most effective in increasing stool weight, with each gram of fiber fed as wheat bran increasing stool weight by 5.4 grams [14]. In contrast, soluble fibers like pectin only increase stool weight by 1.2 grams per gram of fiber fed.

When oat bran and wheat bran were compared for their laxation response, they had the same effect on stool weight, even though wheat bran is mostly insoluble fiber while oat bran is mostly soluble fiber [15]. Bacteria and lipids were the major contributors to the increase in stool weight with oat bran consumption, while undigested plant fiber was responsible for much of the increase in stool weight with wheat bran consumption. Thus the laxation properties of a fiber source cannot be predicted based on the solubility of the fiber.

Not all starch is digested and absorbed during gut transit. Factors that determine whether starch is resistant to digestion include the physical form of grains or seeds in which starch is located, particularly if these are whole or partially disrupted, size and type of starch granules, associations between starch and other dietary components, and cooking and food processing, especially cooking and cooling [3]. Because the starch in whole grains is believed to be more resistant to digestion than refined starch, whole grains should improve the gut environment.

Besides dietary fiber and resistant starch, grains contain significant amounts of oligosaccharides. Oligosaccharides are defined as carbohydrates with low (2–20) degree of polymerization. Common oligosaccharides include oligofructose and inulin. Wheat flour contains from 1% to 4% fructan on a dry weight basis [16]. Fructans have also been found in rye and barley with very young barley kernels containing 22% fructan [16]. Van Loo has estimated that wheat provides 78% of the North American intake of oligosaccharides [16].

Oligosaccharides are thought to have similar effects as soluble dietary fibers in the human gut. Additionally, oligosaccharides have consistently been shown able to alter the human fecal flora. Many human studies [17,18] find that consumption of fructooligosaccharides (FOS) increases bifidobacteria in the gut while decreasing concentrations of E. coli, clostridia and bacteroides.

2. Antioxidants
Oxidative stress results when the balance between the production of reactive oxygen species overrides the antioxidant capability of the target cell. The accumulation of oxidative damage has been implicated in both acute and chronic cell injury, including possible participation in the formation of cancer [19]. Antioxidants are compounds that delay the onset or slow down the rate of oxidation of oxidizable substrates. Whole grains contain many antioxidants, including vitamins, trace minerals and non-nutrients such as phenolic acids, lignans and phytoestrogens, and antinutrients such as phytic acid [20]. Whole grains are concentrated sources of vitamin E, especially tocotrienols. Whole grains are also rich sources of selenium, although selenium content of grains varies with soils. Trace minerals such as copper, zinc and manganese are also concentrated in the outer layer of grains, so milled grains are poor sources of trace minerals.

Phenolic acids are located in the bran layer of grains, and grains are thought to be particularly rich sources of phenolic acids. Durum wheat bran has been shown to have antioxidant activity in an in vitro model [21]. Ferulic acid was the phenolic acid in highest concentration in the wheat bran. The potentially anticarcinogenic mechanism of phenolic compounds involves the induction of detoxification systems, specifically the Phase II conjugation reactions. Wattenberg [22] classified caffeic and ferulic acids as inhibitors acting both by preventing the formation of carcinogens from precursor compounds and by blocking the reaction of carcinogens with critical cellular macromolecules. Phytic acid, concentrated in grains, is a known antioxidant [23]. Phytic acid forms chelates with various metals which suppresses damaging iron-catalyzed redox reactions [24]. Colonic bacteria produce oxygen radicals in appreciable amounts, and dietary phytic acid may suppress oxidant damage to intestinal epithelium and neighboring cells.

Vitamin E is another antioxidant present in whole grains that is removed in the refining process. Vitamin E is an intracellular antioxidant which protects polyunsaturated fatty acids in cell membranes from oxidative damage. Another possible mechanism for vitamin E relates to its capacity to keep selenium in the reduced state. Vitamin E inhibits the formation of nitrosamines, especially at low pH. Wattenberg [22] has characterized vitamin E as a cancer inhibitor that exerts its effect by preventing the formation of carcinogens from precursor compounds. Taken as a whole, the results of animal experiments on the effect of dietary vitamin E in cancer prevention have been inconclusive.

Selenium is another compound that is removed in the refining process. Its food composition is proportional to the selenium content of the soil in which the grain is grown. Selenium functions as a cofactor for glutathione peroxidase, an enzyme that protects against oxidative tissue damage. It has a suppressive action on cell proliferation at high levels. Wattenberg classifies selenium as a suppressing agent, an inhibitor that prevents the expression of neoplasia in cells that have been previously exposed to a carcinogen.

3. Phytoestrogens
Phytoestrogens, which include isoflavones, coumestans and lignans, are estrogenic compounds found in plants that have structural similarity to endogenous estrogens. They are proposed to have chemoprotective benefits [25,26], some of which may be mediated through their effect on endogenous sex hormone production, metabolism and biological activity [27]. Lignans have a diphenolic structure similar to estrogenic compounds, thereby creating interest in a possible estrogenic function for these compounds (Fig. 1). Consumption of certain plants has been known to alter fertility.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Mammalian lignans enterodiol and enterolactone; estradiol.

 
Flaxseed is the richest known source of the main plant lignans, secoisolariciresinol and matairesinol [2830], which are metabolized by the intestinal microflora into the main mammalian lignans, enterodiol and enterolactone (Fig. 1) [31]. Lignans have been shown to inhibit growth of human mammary tumor cells [32], reduce mammary tumor initiation [33] and inhibit aromatase (estrogen synthetase) activity [34]. Consumption of flaxseed has been found to inhibit mammary tumor growth [35] and to reduce early markers of risk for mammary [36] and colon carcinogenesis [37,38].

Consumption of dietary fiber has also been proposed to be chemoprotective due to its influence on endogenous sex hormone levels [39]. Dietary fiber may partially interrupt the enterohepatic circulation of estrogen [40], resulting in increased fecal excretion of estrogens [41]. In premenopausal women, dietary fiber reduced serum estrone and estradiol [42]. Wheat bran reduced serum estrone and estradiol in premenopausal women [43].

Limited information exists on the concentration of lignans and their precursors in food. Due to the association of lignan excretion with fiber intake, it is assumed that plant lignans are contained in the outer layers of the grain. Concentrated sources of lignans include whole grain wheat, whole grain oats and rye meal [44]. Seeds are also concentrated sources of lignans, including flaxseed seeds (the most concentrated source), pumpkin seeds, caraway seeds and sunflower seeds. This compositional data suggests that whole grain breads and cereals are the best ways to deliver lignans in the diet.

Grains and other high fiber foods increase urinary lignan excretion, which is an indirect measure of lignan content in foods [45]. Mammalian lignan production of plant foods was studied by Thompson et al. [46] using an in vitro fermentation method with human fecal microbiota. Oilseeds, particularly flaxseed flour and meal, produced the highest concentration of lignans, followed by dried seaweeds, whole legumes, cereal brans, whole grain cereals, vegetables and fruits. Lignan concentration produced from flaxseed was approximately 100 times greater than that produced from most other foods.

Differences in metabolism of phytoestrogens among individuals have been noted. Adlercreutz et al. [45] found total urinary lignan excretion in Finnish women to be positively correlated with total fiber intake, total fiber intake per kilogram of body weight and grain fiber intake per kilogram of body weight. Similarly, the geometric mean excretion of enterolactone was positively correlated with the geometric mean intake of dietary grain products (kcal/day) of five groups of women (r = 0.996).

Due to the association of lignan excretion with fiber intake, plant lignans are probably concentrated in the outer layers of the grain. Because current processing techniques eliminate this fraction of the grain, lignans may not be found in processed grain products on the market and would only be found in whole grain foods. Thompson et al. [47] found significant differences in lignan content of flaxseed, depending on variety, harvest location, and harvest year, suggesting that extensive analysis of the lignan content of whole grains is warranted.

Estrogen metabolism has become a growing area of interest due to its proposed role in the etiology of breast cancer. Phytoestrogens are thought to alter serum hormones. Flax powder (10 g/day) increased average luteal phase length of the menstrual cycle in pre-menopausal women [48]. Any significant lengthening of the overall cycle length would be potentially beneficial in lowering risk for hormonally-dependent cancers. Additionally, estradiol and its oxidative product, estrone, can be metabolized along two irreversible, mutually exclusive hydroxylation pathways. These pathways form the metabolites 2-OHEstrogen2 (including 2-OHE1 and 2-OHE2) and 16{alpha}-OHE1 (Fig. 2) [49,50]. These metabolites are proposed to have differences in biological activity which may affect breast cancer risk.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Oxidative metabolism of estradiol, (1) 16{alpha}-hydroxylase, (2) 2-hydroxylase.

 
The 2-OHEstrogen metabolites are proposed to have little estrogenic activity and may even act as anti-estrogens [50]. In contrast, the 16{alpha}-OHE1 metabolite is proposed to be associated with increased breast cancer risk due to its significant estrogenic activity [51]. The 16{alpha}-OHE1 metabolite is elevated in women with breast cancer [52]. Because of the competing nature of the 2-hydroxylation and 16{alpha}-hydroxylation pathways and their proposed biological roles, a ratio of the metabolites 2-OHEstrogen and 16{alpha}-OHE1, 2/16{alpha}-OHE1, has been used as a biomarker for breast cancer risk. An increase in the ratio is considered protective due to the relatively greater amount of 2-OHEstrogen than 16{alpha}-OHE1. Recent studies report the ratio is decreased in women with breast cancer [5254].

Certain factors have been shown to influence estrogen metabolism and the 2/16{alpha}-OHE1 ratio. Indole-3-carbinol, a compound found in broccoli and other cruciferous vegetables, has been studied extensively and found to increase the 2/16{alpha}-OHE1 ratio [55]. We have found that daily consumption of 10 grams of ground flaxseed may offer some protection against breast cancer in post-menopausal women by significantly increasing the urinary 2/16{alpha}-OHE1 ratio [56]. Bradlow et al. [57] have proposed that altered estrogen metabolism exists prior to the onset of cancer and is not a byproduct of it. This suggests that influencing the hormonal environment in a protective fashion may help prevent cancer initiation. Further research is required to understand the biological mechanisms and the role in this process of phytoestrogens in whole grains.

4. Insulin Response and Obesity
Obesity and overweight have long been linked as risk factors in the development of cancer. Giovannucci [58] proposed that insulin and colon cancer were linked. He suggests that insulin is an important growth factor of colonic epithelial cells and is a mitogen of tumor cell growth in vitro. Epidemiologic studies find similarity of factors which produce elevated insulin levels with those related to colon cancer risk, including obesity and low physical activity. Two recent studies support the relationship between increased blood glucose and colon cancer. Schoen et al. [59] found that incident colon cancer was linked to higher levels of blood glucose and insulin and larger body weight. Hu et al. [60] noted the similarity of lifestyle and environmental risk factors for type 2 diabetes and colon cancer. They examined the relationship between diabetes and risk of colorectal cancer in the Nurses’ Health Study and found that they were significantly related, with women with diabetes having increased risk of colorectal cancer.

Stoll [61] suggested that breast cancer also is linked to the insulin resistance syndrome. Incidence of breast cancer in the Western world runs parallel to that of the major components of the insulin resistance syndrome, hyperinsulinemia, dyslipidemia, hypertension and atherosclerosis. Nutritional and lifestyle modifications that improve insulin sensitivity may reduce breast cancer risk in women.

The glycemic index is used to compare the glycemic response to foods. The glycemic index is defined as the incremental area under the blood glucose response curve for the test food divided by the corresponding area after an equicarbohydrate portion of white bread, multiplied by 100. It is known that glycemic response is affected by many physiological factors. Other factors affecting the response include the form of the food, cooking, processing, fat content of the food and soluble fiber content of the food.

Whole foods are known to slow digestion and absorption of carbohydrates. Studies have shown that postprandial blood glucose and insulin responses are greatly affected by food structure [62]. Any process that disrupts the physical or botanical structure of food ingredients will increase the plasma glucose and insulin responses. Food structure was found to be more important than gelatinization or presence of viscous dietary fiber in determining glycemic response in a recent study [63]. Another recent study found the importance of preserved structure in foods as an important determinant of glycemic response in diabetics [64]. Refining grains tends to increase glycemic response, and, thus, whole grains should slow glycemic response [65].

Jenkins et al. [66] found that breads made with a high proportion of whole cereal grains reduced the postprandial blood glucose profiles in diabetics because they are more slowly digested than white bread controls or "whole meal" bread made from milled flour. Thus, bran alone may not be as effective as whole grains. This suggests that it is the combination of compounds, including resistant starch and phytate in grains, rather thanjust the dietary fiber that slows digestion and absorption of carbohydrates.

Heaton et al. [67] compared glucose response when subjects consumed whole grains, cracked grains, whole grain flour and refined grain flour. Plasma insulin responses increased stepwise, with whole grains less than cracked grains less than coarse flour less than fine flour. Oatbased meals evoked smaller glucose and insulin responses than wheat- or maize-based meals. Particle size influenced the digestion rate and consequent metabolic effects of wheat and maize, but not oats. They suggest the increased insulin response to finely ground flour may be relevant to the etiology of diseases associated with hyperinsulinemia and to the management of diabetes.

One of the environmental contributors to the obesity epidemic is our calorically dense food supply and lack of exercise. When obese teenage boys were studied, intake of high glycemic index foods was 81% greater than that of low glycemic index foods [68]. The authors conclude that the rapid absorption of glucose after consumption of high-GI meals induces a sequence of hormonal and metabolic changes that promote excessive food intake in obese subjects. Additional studies are needed on differences between grain products and glucose and insulin response.


    CONCLUSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 WHOLE GRAIN FOODS
 EPIDEMIOLOGIC SUPPORT FOR THE...
 MECHANISMS FOR THE...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Whole grains are rich in many components, including dietary fiber, starch, fat, antioxidant nutrients, minerals, vitamin, lignans and phenolic compounds, all of which have been linked to reduced risk of cancer. Most of the components are found in the germ and bran which are reduced in the grain refining process. The most potent protective components of whole grains need identification so efforts can be directed to minimize the losses of physiologically important constituents of grains during processing. Additional research on the mechanisms by which whole grains protect against cancer is needed.

Received February 1, 2000.
    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 WHOLE GRAIN FOODS
 EPIDEMIOLOGIC SUPPORT FOR THE...
 MECHANISMS FOR THE...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Potter JD: Food and phytochemicals, magic bullets and measurement error: A commentary. Am J Epid 144: 1026–1027, 1997.[Free Full Text]
  2. Glitso LV, Knudsen KEB: Milling of whole grain rye to obtain fractions with different dietary fibre characteristics. J Cereal Sci 29: 89–97, 1999.
  3. Stephen AM: Whole grains—Impact of consuming whole grains on physiological effects of dietary fiber and starch. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 34: 499–511, 1994.[Medline]
  4. Herrmann K: Occurrence and content of hydroxycinnamic and hydroxybenzoic acid compounds in foods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 28: 315–347, 1989.[Medline]
  5. Hatcher DW, Kruger JE: Simple phenolic acids in flours prepared from Canadian wheat: relationship to ash content, color, and polyphenol oxidase activity. Cereal Chem 74: 337–343, 1997.
  6. Jacobs DR, Marquart L, Slavin J, Kushi LH: Whole-grain intake and cancer: An expanded review and meta-analysis. Nutr Cancer 30: 85–96, 1998.[Medline]
  7. Chatenoud L, Tavani A, La Vecchia C, Jacobs DR, Negri E, Levi F, Franceschi S: Whole grain food intake and cancer risk. Int J Cancer 77: 24–28, 1998.[Medline]
  8. Fuchs CS, Giovannucci EL, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Willett WC: Dietary fiber and the risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma in women. N Engl J Med 340: 169–176, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Wrick K, Robertson JB, Van Soest PJ: The influence of dietary fiber source on human intestinal transit and stool output. J Nutr 113: 1464–1479, 1983.
  10. McIntyre A, Vincent RM, Perkins AC, Spiller RC: Effect of bran, ispaghula, and inert plastic particles on gastric emptying and small bowel transit in humans: the role of physical factors. Gut 40: 223–227, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Jenkins DJA, Kendall CWC, Vuksan V, Augustin LSA, Li YM, Lee B, Mehling CC, Parker T, Faulkner D, Seyler H, Vidgen E, Fulgoni V: The effect of wheat bran particle size on laxation and colonic fermentation. J Am Coll Nutr 18: 339–345, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. McIntyre A, Gibson PR, Young GP: Butyrate production from dietary fibre and protection against large bowel cancer in a rat model. Gut 34: 386–391, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Cummings JH, Bingham SA, Heaton KW, Eastwood MA: Fecal weight, colon cancer risk and dietary intake of nonstarch polysaccharides (dietary fiber). Gastroenterology 103: 1783–1789, 1992.[Medline]
  14. Cummings JH: The effect of dietary fiber on fecal weight and composition. In Spiller GA (ed): "CRC Handbook of Dietary Fiber in Human Nutrition." Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp 263–333, 1993.
  15. Chen HL, Haack VS, Janecky CW, Vollendorf NW, Marlett JA: Mechanisms by which wheat bran and oat bran increase stool weight in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 86: 711–719, 1998.
  16. Van Loo J, Coussement P, De Leenheer L, Hoebregs H, Smits G: On the presence of inulin and oligofructose as natural ingredients in the western diet. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 35: 525–552, 1995.[Medline]
  17. Gibson GR, Beatty ER, Wang X, Cummings JH: Selective stimulation of bifidobacteria in the human colon by oligofructose and inulin. Gastroenterology 108: 975–982, 1995.[Medline]
  18. Buddington RK, Williams CH, Chen S, Witherly SA: Dietary supplement of neosugar alters the fecal flora and decreases activities of some reductive enzymes in human subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 63: 709–716, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Klaunig JE, Xu Y, Isenberg JS, Bachowski S, Kolaja KL, Jiang J, Stevenson DE, Walborg EF: The role of oxidative stress in chemical carcinogenesis. Environ Health Persp 106S: 289–295, 1998.
  20. Thompson LU: Antioxidants and hormone-mediated benefits of whole grains. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 34: 473–497, 1994.[Medline]
  21. Onyeneho SN, Hettiarachchy NS: Antioxidant activity of durum wheat bran. J Agric Food Chem 40: 1496–1500, 1992.
  22. Wattenberg LW: Chemoprevention of cancer. Cancer Res 45: 1–8, 1985.[Free Full Text]
  23. Graf E, Empson KL, Eaton JW: Phytic acid: A natural antioxidant. J Biol Chem 262: 11647–11650, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Graf E, Eaton JW: Suppresion of colon cancer by dietary phytic acid. Nutr Cancer 19: 11–19, 1993.[Medline]
  25. Kurzer MS, Xu, X: Dietary phytoestrogens. Annu Rev Nutr 17: 353–381, 1997.[Medline]
  26. Knight DC, Eden JA: A review of the clinical effects of phytoestrogens. Obstet Gynecol 87: 897–904, 1996.[Medline]
  27. Adlercreutz H, Mazur W: Phyto-oestrogens and Western diseases. Ann Med 29: 95–120, 1997.[Medline]
  28. Axelson M, Sjovall J, Gustafsson BE, Setchell KD: Origin of lignans in mammals and identification of a precursor from plants. Nature 298: 659–660, 1982.[Medline]
  29. Nesbitt PD, Thompson LU: Lignans in homemade and commercial products containing flaxseed. Nutr Cancer 29: 222–227, 1997.[Medline]
  30. Thompson LU, Robb P, Serraino M, Cheung F: Mammalian lignan production from various foods. Nutr Cancer 16: 43–52, 1991.[Medline]
  31. Borriello SP, Setchell KD, Axelson M, Lawson AM: Production and metabolism of lignans by the human faecal flora. J Appl Bacteriol 58: 37–43, 1985.[Medline]
  32. Hirano T, Fukuoka K, Oka K, Naito T, Hosaka K, Mitsuhashi H, Matsumoto Y: Antiproliferative activity of mammalian lignan derivatives against the human breast carcinoma cell line, ZR-75-1. Cancer Invest 8: 595–602, 1990.[Medline]
  33. Thompson LU, Seidl MM, Rickard SE, Orcheson LJ, Fong HH: Antitumorigenic effect of a mammalian lignan precursor from flaxseed. Nutr Cancer 26: 159–165, 1996.[Medline]
  34. Wang C, Makela T, Hase T, Adlercreutz H, Kurzer, MS: Lignans and flavonoids inhibit aromatase enzyme in human preadipocytes. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 50: 205–212, 1994.[Medline]
  35. Serraino M, Thompson LU: The effect of flaxseed supplementation on the initiation and promotional stages of mammary tumorigenesis. Nutr Cancer 17: 153–159, 1992.[Medline]
  36. Serraino M, Thompson LU: The effect of flaxseed supplementation on early risk markers for mammary carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett 60: 135–142, 1991.[Medline]
  37. Serraino M, Thompson LU: Flaxseed supplementation and early markers of colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett 63: 159–165, 1992.[Medline]
  38. Jenab M, Thompson LU: The influence of flaxseed and lignans on colon carcinogenesis and beta- glucuronidase activity. Carcinogenesis 17: 1343–1348, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Adlercreutz, H: Western diet and Western diseases: some hormonal and biochemical mechanisms and associations. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 201: 3–23, 1990.[Medline]
  40. Adlercreutz H, Hockerstedt K, Bannwart C, Bloigu S, Hamalainen E, Fotsis,T, Ollus A: Effect of dietary components, including lignans and phytoestrogens, on enterohepatic circulation and liver metabolism of estrogens and on sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG). J Steroid Biochem 27: 1135–1144, 1987.[Medline]
  41. Goldin BR, Adlercreutz H, Gorbach SL, Warram JH, Dwyer JT, Swenson L, Woods MN: Estrogen excretion patterns and plasma levels in vegetarian and omnivorous women. N Engl J Med 307: 1542–1547, 1982.[Abstract]
  42. Bagga D, Ashley JM, Geffrey SP, Wang HJ, Barnard R, Korenman S, Heber D: Effects of a very low fat, high fiber diet on serum hormones and menstrual function. Implications for breast cancer prevention. Cancer 76: 2491–2496, 1995.[Medline]
  43. Rose DP, Lubin M, Connolly JM: Effects of diet supplementation with wheat bran on serum estrogen levels in the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. Nutrition 13: 535–539, 1997.[Medline]
  44. Adlercreutz H, Mazur W: Phyto-oestrogens and western diseases. Ann Med 29: 95–120, 1997.
  45. Adlercreutz H, Fotsis T, Bannwart C, Hamalainen E, Bloigu A, Ollus A: Urinary estrogen profile determination in young Finnish vegetarian and omnivorous women. J Steroid Biochem 24: 289–296, 1986.[Medline]
  46. Thompson LU, Robb P, Serraino M, Cheung F: Mammalian lignan production from various foods. Nutr Cancer 16: 43–52, 1991.
  47. Thompson LU, Rickard SE, Cheung F, Kenaschuk EO, Obermeyer WR: Variability in anticancer lignan levels in flaxseed. Nutr Cancer 27: 26–30, 1997.[Medline]
  48. Phipps WR, Martini MC, Lampe JW, Slavin JL, Kurzer MS: Effect of flax seed ingestion on the menstrual cycle. J Clin Endo Metabolism 77: 1215–1219, 1993.
  49. Fishman, J, Bradlow HL, Gallagher TF: Oxidative Metabolism of Estradiol. J Biol Chem 235: 3104–3107, 1960.[Free Full Text]
  50. Schneider J, Huh MM, Bradlow HL, Fishman J: Antiestrogen action of 2-hydroxyestrone on MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 259: 4840–4845, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Fishman J, Schneider J, Hershcope RJ, Bradlow HL: Increased estrogen-16 alpha-hydroxylase activity in women with breast and endometrial cancer. J Steroid Biochem 20: 1077–1081, 1984.[Medline]
  52. Schneider J, Kinne D, Fracchia A, Pierce V, Anderson KE, Bradlow HL, Fishman J: Abnormal oxidative metabolism of estradiol in women with breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79: 3047–3051, 1982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Kabat GC, Chang CJ, Sparano JA, Sepkovic DW, Hu XP, Khalil A, Rosenblatt R, Bradlow HL: Urinary estrogen metabolites and breast cancer: a case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 6: 505–509, 1997.[Abstract]
  54. Ho GH, Luo XW, Ji CY, Foo SC, Ng EH: Urinary 2/16-hydroxyestrone ratio: Correlation with serum insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 and a potential biomarker of breast cancer risk. Ann Acad Med Singapore 27: 294–299, 1998.[Medline]
  55. Bradlow HL, Michnovicz JJ, Halper M, Miller DG, Wong GY, Osborne MP: Long-term responses of women to indole-3-carbinol or a high fiber diet. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 3: 591–595, 1994.[Abstract]
  56. Haggans CJ, Hutchins AM, Olson BA, Thomas W, Martini MC, Slavin JL: The effect of flaxseed consumption on urinary estrogen metabolites in postmenopausal women. Nutr Cancer 33: 188–195, 1999.[Medline]
  57. Bradlow H, Hershcopf RJ, Martucci CP, Fishman J: Estradiol 16 alpha-hydroxylation in the mouse correlates with mammary tumor incidence and presence of murine mammary tumor virus: a possible model for the hormonal etiology of breast cancer in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82: 6295–6299, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Giovannucci E: Insulin and colon cancer. Cancer Causes & Control 6: 164–179, 1995.[Medline]
  59. Schoen RE Tangen CM, Kuller LH, Burke GL, Cushman M, Tracy RP, Dobs A, Savage PJ: Increased blood glucose and insulin, body size and incident colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 91: 1147–1154, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Hu FB, Manson JE, Liu S, Hunter D, Colditz GA, Michels KB, Speizer FE, Giovannucci E: Prospective study of adult onset diabetes mellitus (type 2) and risk of colorectal cancer in women. J Natl Cancer Inst 91: 542–547, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Stoll BA: Western nutrition and the insulin resistance syndrome: a link to breast cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr 53: 83–87, 1999.[Medline]
  62. Bjorck I, Granfeldt Y, Lilijeberg H, Tovar J, Asp N: Food properties affecting the digestion and absorption of carbohydrates. Am J Clin Nutr 59S: 688S–705S, 1994.
  63. Granfeldt Y, Hagander B, Bjorck I: Metabolic responses to starch in oat and wheat products. On the importance of food structure, incomplete gelatinization or presence of viscous dietary fibre. Eur J Clin Nutr 49: 189–199, 1995.[Medline]
  64. Jarvi A, Karlstrom B, Granfeldt YE, Bjorck I, Vessby B: The influence of food structure on postprandial metabolism in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Clin Nutr 61: 837–842, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Jenkins DJA, Wolever TMS, Jenkins AL, Giordano C, Giudici S, Thompson LU, Kalmusky J, Josse RG, Wong GS: Low glycemic response to traditionally processed wheat and rye products: bulgur and pumpernickel bread. Am J Clin Nutr 43: 516–520, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Jenkins, DJ, Wesson V, Wolever TM, Jenkins AL, Kalmusky J, Guidici S, Csima A, Josse RG, Wong GS: Wholemeal versus wholegrain breads: proportion of whole or cracked grain and the glycaemic response. Brit Med J 297: 958–960, 1988.
  67. Heaton KW, Marcus SN, Emmett PM, Bolton CH: Particle size of wheat, maize, and oat test meals: effects on plasma glucose and insulin responses and on the rate of starch digestion in vitro. Am J Clin Nutr 47: 675–682, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Ludwig DS, Majzoub JA, Al-Zahrani A, Dallal GE, Blanco I, Roberts SB: High glycemic index foods, overeating, and obesity. Pediatrics 103: E26, 1999.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
C. K. Good, N. Holschuh, A. M. Albertson, and A. L. Eldridge
Whole Grain Consumption and Body Mass Index in Adult Women: An Analysis of NHANES 1999-2000 and the USDA Pyramid Servings Database
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2008; 27(1): 80 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
E. V Bandera, L. H Kushi, D. F Moore, D. M Gifkins, and M. L McCullough
Association between dietary fiber and endometrial cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2007; 86(6): 1730 - 1737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. T Merchant, W. Pitiphat, M. Franz, and K. J Joshipura
Whole-grain and fiber intakes and periodontitis risk in men
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2006; 83(6): 1395 - 1400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Regina, A. Bird, D. Topping, S. Bowden, J. Freeman, T. Barsby, B. Kosar-Hashemi, Z. Li, S. Rahman, and M. Morell
High-amylose wheat generated by RNA interference improves indices of large-bowel health in rats.
PNAS, March 7, 2006; 103(10): 3546 - 3551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C.-Y. Chen, P. E. Milbury, H.-K. Kwak, F. W. Collins, P. Samuel, and J. B. Blumberg
Avenanthramides and Phenolic Acids from Oats Are Bioavailable and Act Synergistically with Vitamin C to Enhance Hamster and Human LDL Resistance to Oxidation
J. Nutr., June 1, 2004; 134(6): 1459 - 1466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. T. Kappagoda, D. A. Hyson, and E. A. Amsterdam
Low-carbohydrate-high-protein diets: Is there a place for them in clinical cardiology?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 3, 2004; 43(5): 725 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
P. Terry, M. Jain, A. B. Miller, G. R. Howe, and T. E. Rohan
No Association among Total Dietary Fiber, Fiber Fractions, and Risk of Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2002; 11(11): 1507 - 1508.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
L. H. Kushi, J. E. Cunningham, J. R. Hebert, R. H. Lerman, E. V. Bandera, and J. Teas
The Macrobiotic Diet in Cancer
J. Nutr., November 1, 2001; 131(11): 3056S - 3064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
L. Marquart, D. R. Jacobs Jr, and J. L. Slavin
Whole Grains and Health: An Overview
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., June 1, 2000; 19(90003): 289S - 290.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slavin, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slavin, J. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS